diff --git a/.openpublishing.redirection.json b/.openpublishing.redirection.json index eb68a9f921..bd9b057880 100644 --- a/.openpublishing.redirection.json +++ b/.openpublishing.redirection.json @@ -6,6 +6,21 @@ "redirect_document_id": true }, { +"source_path": "windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md", +"redirect_url": "/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures", +"redirect_document_id": true +}, +{ +"source_path": "windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md", +"redirect_url": "/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures", +"redirect_document_id": false +}, +{ +"source_path": "windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md", +"redirect_url": "/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures", +"redirect_document_id": false +}, +{ "source_path": "windows/security/threat-protection/intelligence/transparency-report.md", "redirect_url": "/windows/security/threat-protection/intelligence/av-tests", "redirect_document_id": true diff --git a/devices/hololens/hololens-insider.md b/devices/hololens/hololens-insider.md index 6418b56548..a22acbdaf9 100644 --- a/devices/hololens/hololens-insider.md +++ b/devices/hololens/hololens-insider.md @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ When you’re done with setup, go to **Settings -> Update & Security -> Windows ## Note for language support - You can’t change the system language between English, Japanese, and Chinese using the Settings app. Flashing a new build is the only supported way to change the device system language. -- While you can enter Simplified Chinese / Japanese text using the on-screen Pinyin keyboard, typing in Simplified Chinese / Japanese using a Bluetooth hardware keyboard is not supported at this time. However, on Chinese/Japanese HoloLens, you can continue to use a BT keyboard to type in English (the ~ key on a hardware keyboard toggles the keyboard to type in English). +- While you can enter Simplified Chinese / Japanese text using the on-screen Pinyin keyboard, typing in Simplified Chinese / Japanese using a Bluetooth hardware keyboard is not supported at this time. However, on Chinese/Japanese HoloLens, you can continue to use a BT keyboard to type in English (the Shift key on a hardware keyboard toggles the keyboard to type in English). ## Note for developers diff --git a/devices/hololens/hololens-install-apps.md b/devices/hololens/hololens-install-apps.md index 3de34452cf..f21afb8e8a 100644 --- a/devices/hololens/hololens-install-apps.md +++ b/devices/hololens/hololens-install-apps.md @@ -79,13 +79,15 @@ Using Intune, you can also [monitor your app deployment](https://docs.microsoft. >[!TIP] >If you see a certificate error in the browser, follow [these troubleshooting steps](https://developer.microsoft.com/windows/mixed-reality/Using_the_Windows_Device_Portal.html#security_certificate). -4. In the Windows Device Portal, click **Apps**. +4. In the Windows Device Portal, click **Views** and select **Apps**. ![App Manager](images/apps.png) -5. In **Install app**, select an **app package** from a folder on your computer or network. If the app package requires additional software, click **Add dependency**. +5. Click **Add** to open the **Deploy or Install Application dialog**. -6. In **Deploy**, click **Go** to deploy the app package and added dependencies to the connected HoloLens. +6. Select an **app package** from a folder on your computer or network. If the app package requires additional software or framework packages, click **I want to specify framework packages**. + +7. Click **Next** to deploy the app package and added dependencies to the connected HoloLens. diff --git a/devices/hololens/images/apps.png b/devices/hololens/images/apps.png index 5cb3b7ec8f..4e00aa96fc 100644 Binary files a/devices/hololens/images/apps.png and b/devices/hololens/images/apps.png differ diff --git a/devices/hololens/images/windows-device-portal-home-page.png b/devices/hololens/images/windows-device-portal-home-page.png index 9604161bcd..55e4b0eaad 100644 Binary files a/devices/hololens/images/windows-device-portal-home-page.png and b/devices/hololens/images/windows-device-portal-home-page.png differ diff --git a/windows/deployment/update/change-history-for-update-windows-10.md b/windows/deployment/update/change-history-for-update-windows-10.md index e76b08389c..9e529d5f34 100644 --- a/windows/deployment/update/change-history-for-update-windows-10.md +++ b/windows/deployment/update/change-history-for-update-windows-10.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ms.mktglfcycl: manage ms.sitesec: library author: DaniHalfin ms.author: daniha -ms.date: 10/17/2017 +ms.date: 09/05/2019 --- # Change history for Update Windows 10 @@ -38,6 +38,5 @@ All topics were updated to reflect the new [naming changes](waas-overview.md#nam ## RELEASE: Windows 10, version 1703 The topics in this library have been updated for Windows 10, version 1703 (also known as the Creators Update). The following new topics have been added: -* [Windows Insider Program for Business](waas-windows-insider-for-business.md) -* [Windows Insider Program for Business using Azure Active Directory](waas-windows-insider-for-business-aad.md) -* [Windows Insider Program for Business Frequently Asked Questions](waas-windows-insider-for-business-faq.md) \ No newline at end of file +* [Windows Insider Program for Business](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows-insider/at-work-pro/wip-4-biz-get-started) +* [Windows Insider Program for Business](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows-insider/at-work-pro/wip-4-biz-register) diff --git a/windows/deployment/update/waas-overview.md b/windows/deployment/update/waas-overview.md index 74fdfc0efd..9b07031bb6 100644 --- a/windows/deployment/update/waas-overview.md +++ b/windows/deployment/update/waas-overview.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library author: Jaimeo ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.author: jaimeo -ms.date: 06/01/2018 +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- # Overview of Windows as a service @@ -138,10 +138,9 @@ Specialized systems—such as PCs that control medical equipment, point-of-sale Microsoft never publishes feature updates through Windows Update on devices that run Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB. Instead, it typically offers new LTSC releases every 2–3 years, and organizations can choose to install them as in-place upgrades or even skip releases over a 10-year life cycle. >[!NOTE] ->Windows 10 LTSB will support the currently released silicon at the time of release of the LTSB. As future silicon generations are released, support will be created through future Windows 10 LTSB releases that customers can deploy for those systems. For more information, see **Supporting the latest processor and chipsets on Windows** in [Lifecycle support policy FAQ - Windows Products](https://support.microsoft.com/help/18581/lifecycle-support-policy-faq-windows-products). +>Windows 10 LTSB will support the currently released processors and chipsets at the time of release of the LTSB. As future CPU generations are released, support will be created through future Windows 10 LTSB releases that customers can deploy for those systems. For more information, see **Supporting the latest processor and chipsets on Windows** in [Lifecycle support policy FAQ - Windows Products](https://support.microsoft.com/help/18581/lifecycle-support-policy-faq-windows-products). -The Long-term Servicing Channel is available only in the Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB edition. This build of Windows doesn’t contain many in-box applications, such as Microsoft Edge, Microsoft Store, Cortana (limited search capabilities remain available), Microsoft Mail, Calendar, OneNote, Weather, News, Sports, Money, Photos, Camera, Music, and Clock. Since these apps aren’t included then not supported in Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB edition, including the case of the in-box application sideloading. -Therefore, it’s important to remember that Microsoft has positioned the LTSC model primarily for specialized devices. +The Long-term Servicing Channel is available only in the Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB edition. This edition of Windows doesn’t include a number of applications, such as Microsoft Edge, Microsoft Store, Cortana (though limited search capabilities remain available), Microsoft Mail, Calendar, OneNote, Weather, News, Sports, Money, Photos, Camera, Music, and Clock. These apps are not supported in Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB edition, even of you install by using sideloading. >[!NOTE] >If an organization has devices currently running Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB that it would like to change to the Semi-Annual Channel, it can make the change without losing user data. Because LTSB is its own SKU, however, an upgrade is required from Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB to Windows 10 Enterprise, which supports the Semi-Annual Channel. diff --git a/windows/security/identity-protection/user-account-control/user-account-control-group-policy-and-registry-key-settings.md b/windows/security/identity-protection/user-account-control/user-account-control-group-policy-and-registry-key-settings.md index c0e5e23158..0854da77c6 100644 --- a/windows/security/identity-protection/user-account-control/user-account-control-group-policy-and-registry-key-settings.md +++ b/windows/security/identity-protection/user-account-control/user-account-control-group-policy-and-registry-key-settings.md @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ The registry keys are found in **HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Wind | Registry key | Group Policy setting | Registry setting | | - | - | - | | FilterAdministratorToken | [User Account Control: Admin Approval Mode for the built-in Administrator account](#user-account-control-admin-approval-mode-for-the-built-in-administrator-account) | 0 (Default) = Disabled
1 = Enabled | -| EnableUIADesktopToggle | [User Account Control: Allow UIAccess applications to prompt for elevation without using the secure desktop](#user-account-control-allow-uiaccess-applications-to prompt-for-elevation-without-using-the-secure-desktop) | 0 (Default) = Disabled
1 = Enabled | +| EnableUIADesktopToggle | [User Account Control: Allow UIAccess applications to prompt for elevation without using the secure desktop](#user-account-control-allow-uiaccess-applications-to-prompt-for-elevation-without-using-the-secure-desktop) | 0 (Default) = Disabled
1 = Enabled | | ConsentPromptBehaviorAdmin | [User Account Control: Behavior of the elevation prompt for administrators in Admin Approval Mode](#user-account-control-behavior-of-the-elevation-prompt-for-administrators-in-admin-approval-mode) | 0 = Elevate without prompting
1 = Prompt for credentials on the secure desktop
2 = Prompt for consent on the secure desktop
3 = Prompt for credentials
4 = Prompt for consent
5 (Default) = Prompt for consent for non-Windows binaries
| | ConsentPromptBehaviorUser | [User Account Control: Behavior of the elevation prompt for standard users](#user-account-control-behavior-of-the-elevation-prompt-for-standard-users) | 0 = Automatically deny elevation requests
1 = Prompt for credentials on the secure desktop
3 (Default) = Prompt for credentials | | EnableInstallerDetection | [User Account Control: Detect application installations and prompt for elevation](#user-account-control-detect-application-installations-and-prompt-for-elevation) | 1 = Enabled (default for home)
0 = Disabled (default for enterprise) | diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/TOC.md b/windows/security/information-protection/TOC.md index b9c98da745..4afb579db3 100644 --- a/windows/security/information-protection/TOC.md +++ b/windows/security/information-protection/TOC.md @@ -22,14 +22,13 @@ ### [BitLocker Group Policy settings](bitlocker\bitlocker-group-policy-settings.md) ### [BCD settings and BitLocker](bitlocker\bcd-settings-and-bitlocker.md) ### [BitLocker Recovery Guide](bitlocker\bitlocker-recovery-guide-plan.md) -### [Protect BitLocker from pre-boot attacks](bitlocker\protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md) -#### [Types of attacks for volume encryption keys](bitlocker\types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md) -#### [BitLocker Countermeasures](bitlocker\bitlocker-countermeasures.md) -#### [Choose the Right BitLocker Countermeasure](bitlocker\choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md) +### [BitLocker Countermeasures](bitlocker\bitlocker-countermeasures.md) ### [Protecting cluster shared volumes and storage area networks with BitLocker](bitlocker\protecting-cluster-shared-volumes-and-storage-area-networks-with-bitlocker.md) ## [Encrypted Hard Drive](encrypted-hard-drive.md) +## [Kernel DMA Protection for Thunderbolt™ 3](kernel-dma-protection-for-thunderbolt.md) + ## [Protect your enterprise data using Windows Information Protection (WIP)](windows-information-protection\protect-enterprise-data-using-wip.md) ### [Create a Windows Information Protection (WIP) policy using Microsoft Intune](windows-information-protection\overview-create-wip-policy.md) #### [Create a Windows Information Protection (WIP) policy using the classic console for Microsoft Intune](windows-information-protection\create-wip-policy-using-intune.md) diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures.md b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures.md index ea8973ef41..91d9c277db 100644 --- a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures.md +++ b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures.md @@ -7,137 +7,185 @@ ms.mktglfcycl: deploy ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security author: brianlic-msft -ms.date: 10/27/2017 +ms.date: 09/06/2018 --- + # BitLocker Countermeasures **Applies to** - Windows 10 -Windows uses technologies including TPM, Secure Boot, Trusted Boot, and Early Launch Antimalware (ELAM) to protect against attacks on the BitLocker encryption key. -BitLocker is part of a strategic approach to securing mobile data through encryption technology. Data on a lost or stolen computer is vulnerable to unauthorized access, either by running a software attack tool against it or by transferring the computer’s hard disk to a different computer. Today, BitLocker helps mitigate unauthorized data access on lost or stolen computers before the operating system is started by: +Windows uses technologies including Trusted Platform Module (TPM), Secure Boot, and Measured Boot to help protect BitLocker encryption keys against attacks. +BitLocker is part of a strategic approach to securing data against offline attacks through encryption technology. +Data on a lost or stolen computer is vulnerable. +For example, there could be unauthorized access, either by running a software attack tool against it or by transferring the computer’s hard disk to a different computer. -- **Encrypting the hard drives on your computer.** For example, you can turn on BitLocker for your operating system drive, a fixed data drive, or a removable data drive (such as a USB flash drive). Turning on BitLocker for your operating system drive encrypts all system files on the operating system drive, including the swap files and hibernation files. -- **Ensuring the integrity of early boot components and boot configuration data.** On devices that have a TPM version 1.2 or higher, BitLocker uses the enhanced security capabilities of the TPM to help ensure that your data is accessible only if the computer’s boot components appear unaltered and the encrypted disk is located in the original computer. +BitLocker helps mitigate unauthorized data access on lost or stolen computers before the authorized operating system is started by: -The sections that follow provide more detailed information about the different technologies that Windows uses to protect against attacks on the BitLocker encryption key in four different boot phases: before startup, during pre-boot, during startup, and finally after startup. +- **Encrypting volumes on your computer.** For example, you can turn on BitLocker for your operating system volume, or a volume on a fixed or removable data drive (such as a USB flash drive, SD card, and so on). Turning on BitLocker for your operating system volume encrypts all system files on the volume, including the paging files and hibernation files. The only exception is for the System partition, which includes the Windows Boot Manager and minimal boot collateral required for decryption of the operating system volume after the key is unsealed. +- **Ensuring the integrity of early boot components and boot configuration data.** On devices that have a TPM version 1.2 or higher, BitLocker uses the enhanced security capabilities of the TPM to make data accessible only if the computer’s BIOS firmware code and configuration, original boot sequence, boot components, and BCD configuration all appear unaltered and the encrypted disk is located in the original computer. On systems that leverage TPM PCR[7], BCD setting changes deemed safe are permitted to improve usability. +  +The next sections provide more details about how Windows protects against various attacks on the BitLocker encryption keys in Windows 10, Windows 8.1, and Windows 8. -### Protection before startup +For more information about how to enable the best overall security configuration for devices beginning with Windows 10 version 1803, see [Standards for a highly secure Windows 10 device](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-highly-secure). -Before Windows starts, you must rely on security features implemented as part of the device hardware, including TPM and Secure Boot. Fortunately, many modern computers feature TPM. +## Protection before startup -#### Trusted Platform Module +Before Windows starts, you must rely on security features implemented as part of the device hardware and firmware, including TPM and Secure Boot. Fortunately, many modern computers feature a TPM and Secure Boot. -Software alone isn’t sufficient to protect a system. After an attacker has compromised software, the software might be unable to detect the compromise. Therefore, a single successful software compromise results in an untrusted system that might never be detected. Hardware, however, is much more difficult to modify. +### Trusted Platform Module -A TPM is a microchip designed to provide basic security-related functions, primarily involving encryption keys. The TPM is usually installed on the motherboard of a computer and communicates with the rest of the system through a hardware bus. Physically, TPMs are designed to be tamper-proof. If an attacker tries to physically retrieve data directly from the chip, they’ll probably destroy the chip in the process. -By binding the BitLocker encryption key with the TPM and properly configuring the device, it’s nearly impossible for an attacker to gain access to the BitLocker-encrypted data without obtaining an authorized user’s credentials. Therefore, computers with a TPM can provide a high level of protection against attacks that attempt to directly retrieve the BitLocker encryption key. -For more info about TPM, see [Trusted Platform Module](/windows/device-security/tpm/trusted-platform-module-overview). +A TPM is a microchip designed to provide basic security-related functions, primarily involving encryption keys. +On some platforms, TPM can alternatively be implemented as a part of secure firmware. +BitLocker binds encryption keys with the TPM to ensure that a computer has not been tampered with while the system was offline. +For more info about TPM, see [Trusted Platform Module](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/device-security/tpm/trusted-platform-module-overview). -#### UEFI and Secure Boot +### UEFI and Secure Boot -No operating system can protect a device when the operating system is offline. For that reason, Microsoft worked closely with hardware vendors to require firmware-level protection against boot and rootkits that might compromise an encryption solution’s encryption keys. +Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) is a programmable boot environment that initializes devices and starts the operating system’s bootloader. -The UEFI is a programmable boot environment introduced as a replacement for BIOS, which has for the most part remained unchanged for the past 30 years. Like BIOS, PCs start UEFI before any other software; it initializes devices, and UEFI then starts the operating system’s bootloader. As part of its introduction into the pre–operating system environment, UEFI serves a number of purposes, but one of the key benefits is to protect newer devices against a sophisticated type of malware called a bootkit through the use of its Secure Boot feature. +The UEFI specification defines a firmware execution authentication process called [Secure Boot](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/information-protection/secure-the-windows-10-boot-process). +Secure Boot blocks untrusted firmware and bootloaders (signed or unsigned) from being able to start on the system. -Recent implementations of UEFI (starting with version 2.3.1) can verify the digital signatures of the device’s firmware before running it. Because only the PC’s hardware manufacturer has access to the digital certificate required to create a valid firmware signature, UEFI can prevent firmware-based bootkits. Thus, UEFI is the first link in the chain of trust. +By default, BitLocker provides integrity protection for Secure Boot by utilizing the TPM PCR[7] measurement. +An unauthorized EFI firmware, EFI boot application, or bootloader cannot run and acquire the BitLocker key. -Secure Boot is the foundation of platform and firmware security and was created to enhance security in the pre-boot environment regardless of device architecture. Using signatures to validate the integrity of firmware images before they are allowed to execute, Secure Boot helps reduce the risk of bootloader attacks. The purpose of Secure Boot is to block untrusted firmware and bootloaders (signed or unsigned) from being able to start on the system. -With the legacy BIOS boot process, the pre–operating system environment is vulnerable to attacks by redirecting bootloader handoff to possible malicious loaders. These loaders could remain undetected to operating system and antimalware software. The diagram in Figure 1 contrasts the BIOS and UEFI startup processes. +### BitLocker and reset attacks -![the bios and uefi startup processes](images/bitlockerprebootprotection-bios-uefi-startup.jpg) +To defend against malicious reset attacks, BitLocker leverages the TCG Reset Attack Mitigation, also known as MOR bit (Memory Overwrite Request), before extracting keys into memory. -**Figure 1.** The BIOS and UEFI startup processes +>[!NOTE] +>This does not protect against physical attacks where an attacker opens the case and attacks the hardware. -With Secure Boot enabled, UEFI, in coordination with the TPM, can examine the bootloader and determine whether it’s trustworthy. To determine whether the bootloader is trustworthy, UEFI examines the bootloader’s digital signature. -Using the digital signature, UEFI verifies that the bootloader was signed using a trusted certificate. +## Security policies -If the bootloader passes these two tests, UEFI knows that the bootloader isn’t a bootkit and starts it. At this point, Trusted Boot takes over, and the Windows bootloader, using the same cryptographic technologies that UEFI used to verify the bootloader, then verifies that the Windows system files haven’t been changed. +The next sections cover pre-boot authentication and DMA policies that can provide additional protection for BitLocker. -Starting with Windows 8, certified devices must meet several requirements related to UEFI-based Secure Boot: +### Pre-boot authentication -- They must have Secure Boot enabled by default. -- They must trust Microsoft’s certificate (and thus any bootloader Microsoft has signed). -- They must allow the user to configure Secure Boot to trust other signed bootloaders. -- Except for Windows RT devices, they must allow the user to completely disable Secure Boot. +Pre-boot authentication with BitLocker is a policy setting that requires the use of either user input, such as a PIN, a startup key, or both to authenticate prior to making the contents of the system drive accessible. +The Group Policy setting is [Require additional authentication at startup](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-group-policy-settings#a-href-idbkmk-unlockpol1arequire-additional-authentication-at-startup) and the corresponding setting in the [BitLocker CSP](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/client-management/mdm/bitlocker-csp) is SystemDrivesRequireStartupAuthentication. -These requirements help protect you from rootkits while allowing you to run any operating system you want. You have three options for running non-Microsoft operating systems: +BitLocker accesses and stores the encryption keys in memory only after pre-boot authentication is completed. +If Windows can’t access the encryption keys, the device can’t read or edit the files on the system drive. The only option for bypassing pre-boot authentication is entering the recovery key. -- **Use an operating system with a certified bootloader.** Microsoft can analyze and sign non-Microsoft bootloaders so that they can be trusted. The Linux community is using this process to enable Linux to take advantage of -Secure Boot on Windows-certified devices. - -- **Configure UEFI to trust your custom bootloader.** Your device can trust a signed, non-certified bootloader that you specify in the UEFI database, allowing you to run any operating system, including homemade operating systems. -- **Turn off Secure Boot.** You can turn off Secure Boot. This does not help protect you from bootkits, however. - -To prevent malware from abusing these options, the user has to manually configure the UEFI firmware to trust a non-certified bootloader or to turn off Secure Boot. Software cannot change the Secure Boot settings. -Any device that doesn’t require Secure Boot or a similar bootloader-verification technology, regardless of the architecture or operating system, is vulnerable to bootkits, which can be used to compromise the encryption solution. -UEFI is secure by design, but it’s critical to protect the Secure Boot configuration by using password protection. In addition, although several well-publicized attacks against UEFI have occurred, they were exploiting faulty UEFI implementations. Those attacks are ineffective when UEFI is implemented properly. - -For more information about Secure Boot, refer to [Securing the Windows 8.1 Boot Process](https://technet.microsoft.com/windows/dn168167.aspx). - -### Protection during pre-boot: Pre-boot authentication - -Pre-boot authentication with BitLocker is a process that requires the use of either a Trusted Platform Module (TPM), user input, such as a PIN, or both, depending on hardware and operating system configuration, to authenticate prior to making the contents of the system drive accessible. In the case of BitLocker, BitLocker encrypts the entire drive, including all system files. BitLocker accesses and stores the encryption key in memory only after a pre-boot authentication is completed using one or more of the following options: Trusted Platform Module (TPM), user provides a specific PIN, USB startup key. - -If Windows can’t access the encryption key, the device can’t read or edit the files on the system drive. Even if an attacker takes the disk out of the PC or steals the entire PC, they won’t be able to read or edit the files without the encryption key. The only option for bypassing pre-boot authentication is entering the highly complex, 48-digit recovery key. - -The BitLocker pre-boot authentication capability is not specifically designed to prevent the operating system from starting: That’s merely a side effect of how BitLocker protects data confidentiality and system integrity. Pre-boot authentication is designed to prevent the encryption key from being loaded to system memory on devices that are vulnerable to certain types of cold boot attacks. Many modern devices prevent an attacker from easily removing the memory, and Microsoft expects those devices to become even more common in the future. +Pre-boot authentication is designed to prevent the encryption keys from being loaded to system memory without the trusted user supplying another authentication factor such as a PIN or startup key. +This helps mitigate DMA and memory remanence attacks. On computers with a compatible TPM, operating system drives that are BitLocker-protected can be unlocked in four ways: -- **TPM-only.** Using TPM-only validation does not require any interaction with the user to decrypt and provide access to the drive. If the TPM validation succeeds, the user logon experience is the same as a standard logon. If the TPM is missing or changed or if the TPM detects changes to critical operating system startup files, BitLocker enters its recovery mode, and the user must enter a recovery password to regain access to the data. -- **TPM with startup key.** In addition to the protection that the TPM provides, part of the encryption key is stored on a USB flash drive, referred to as a startup key. Data on the encrypted volume cannot be accessed without the startup key. -- **TPM with PIN.** In addition to the protection that the TPM provides, BitLocker requires that the user enter a PIN. Data on the encrypted volume cannot be accessed without entering the PIN. -- **TPM with startup key and PIN.** In addition to the core component protection that the TPM provides, part of the encryption key is stored on a USB flash drive, and a PIN is required to authenticate the user to the TPM. This configuration provides multifactor authentication so that if the USB key is lost or stolen, it cannot be used for access to the drive, because the correct PIN is also required. +- **TPM-only.** Using TPM-only validation does not require any interaction with the user to unlock and provide access to the drive. If the TPM validation succeeds, the user sign in experience is the same as a standard logon. If the TPM is missing or changed or if BitLocker detects changes to the BIOS or UEFI code or configuration, critical operating system startup files, or the boot configuration, BitLocker enters recovery mode, and the user must enter a recovery password to regain access to the data. This option is more convenient for sign-in but less secure than the other options, which require an additional authentication factor. +- **TPM with startup key.** In addition to the protection that the TPM-only provides, part of the encryption key is stored on a USB flash drive, referred to as a startup key. Data on the encrypted volume cannot be accessed without the startup key. +- **TPM with PIN.** In addition to the protection that the TPM provides, BitLocker requires that the user enter a PIN. Data on the encrypted volume cannot be accessed without entering the PIN. TPMs also have [anti-hammering protection](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/hardware-protection/tpm/tpm-fundamentals#anti-hammering) that is designed to prevent brute force attacks that attempt to determine the PIN. +- **TPM with startup key and PIN.** In addition to the core component protection that the TPM-only provides, part of the encryption key is stored on a USB flash drive, and a PIN is required to authenticate the user to the TPM. This configuration provides multifactor authentication so that if the USB key is lost or stolen, it cannot be used for access to the drive, because the correct PIN is also required. -For many years, Microsoft has recommended using pre-boot authentication to protect against DMA and memory remanence attacks. Today, Microsoft only recommends using pre-boot authentication on PCs where the mitigations described in this document cannot be implemented. These mitigations may be inherent to the device or may come by way of configurations that IT can provision to devices and Windows itself. +In the following Group Policy example, TPM + PIN is required to unlock an operating system drive: -Although effective, pre-boot authentication is inconvenient to users. In addition, if a user forgets their PIN or loses their startup key, they’re denied access to their data until they can contact their organization’s support team to obtain a recovery key. Today, most new PCs running Windows 10, Windows 8.1, or Windows 8 provide sufficient protection against DMA attacks without requiring pre-boot authentication. For example, most modern PCs include USB port options (which are not vulnerable to DMA attacks) but do not include FireWire or Thunderbolt ports (which are vulnerable to DMA attacks). +![Pre-boot authentication setting in Group Policy](images/pre-boot-authentication-group-policy.png) -BitLocker-encrypted devices with DMA ports enabled, including FireWire or Thunderbolt ports, should be configured with pre-boot authentication if they are running Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, or Windows 8.1 and disabling the ports using policy or firmware configuration is not an option. Many customers find that the DMA ports on their devices are never used, and they choose to eliminate the possibility of an attack by disabling the DMA ports themselves, either at the hardware level or through Group Policy. -Many new mobile devices have the system memory soldered to the motherboard, which helps prevent the cold boot–style attack, where the system memory is frozen, removed, and then placed into another device. Those devices, and most PCs, can still be vulnerable when booting to a malicious operating system, however. +Pre-boot authentication with a PIN can mitigate an attack vector for devices that use a bootable eDrive because an exposed eDrive bus can allow an attacker to capture the BitLocker encryption key during startup. +Pre-boot authentication with a PIN can also mitigate DMA port attacks during the window of time between when BitLocker unlocks the drive and Windows boots to the point that Windows can set any port-related policies that have been configured. -You can mitigate the risk of booting to a malicious operating system: +On the other hand, Pre-boot authentication prompts can be inconvenient to users. +In addition, users who forget their PIN or lose their startup key are denied access to their data until they can contact their organization’s support team to obtain a recovery key. +Pre-boot authentication can also make it more difficult to update unattended desktops and remotely administered servers because a PIN needs to be entered when a computer reboots or resumes from hibernation. -- **Windows 10 (without Secure Boot), Windows 8.1 (without Secure Boot), Windows 8 (without UEFI-based Secure Boot), or Windows 7 (with or without a TPM).** Disable booting from external media, and require a firmware password to prevent the attacker from changing that option. -- **Windows 10, Windows 8.1, or Windows 8 (certified or with Secure Boot).** Password protect the firmware, and do not disable Secure Boot. +To address these issues, you can deploy [BitLocker Network Unlock](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-how-to-enable-network-unlock). +Network Unlock allows systems within the physical enterprise security perimeter that meet the hardware requirements and have BitLocker enabled with TPM+PIN to boot into Windows without user intervention. +It requires direct ethernet connectivity to an enterprise Windows Deployment Services (WDS) server. -### Protection During Startup +### Protecting Thunderbolt and other DMA ports -During the startup process, Windows 10 uses Trusted Boot and Early Launch Antimalware (ELAM) to examine the integrity of every component. The sections that follow describe these technologies in more detail. +There are a few different options to protect DMA ports, such as Thunderbolt™3. +Beginning with Windows 10 version 1803, new Intel-based devices have kernel protection against DMA attacks via Thunderbolt™ 3 ports enabled by default. +This kernel DMA protection is available only for new systems beginning with Windows 10 version 1803, as it requires changes in the system firmware and/or BIOS. -**Trusted Boot** +You can use the System Information desktop app (MSINFO32) to check if a device has kernel DMA protection enabled: -Trusted Boot takes over where UEFI-based Secure Boot leaves off—during the operating system initialization phase. The bootloader verifies the digital signature of the Windows kernel before loading it. The Windows kernel, in turn, verifies every other component of the Windows startup process, including the boot drivers, startup files, and ELAM driver. If a file has been modified or is not properly signed with a Microsoft signature, Windows detects the problem and refuses to load the corrupted component. Often, Windows can automatically repair the corrupted component, restoring the integrity of Windows and allowing the PC to start normally. +![Kernel DMA protection](images/kernel-dma-protection.png) -Windows 10 uses Trusted Boot on any hardware platform: It requires neither UEFI nor a TPM. However, without Secure Boot, it’s possible for malware to compromise the startup process prior to Windows starting, at which point Trusted Boot protections could be bypassed or potentially disabled. +If kernel DMA protection *not* enabled, follow these steps to protect Thunderbolt™ 3 enabled ports: -**Early Launch Antimalware** +1. Require a password for BIOS changes +2. Intel Thunderbolt Security must be set to User Authorization in BIOS settings +3. Additional DMA security may be added by deploying policy (beginning with Windows 10 version 1607): -Because UEFI-based Secure Boot has protected the bootloader and Trusted Boot has protected the Windows kernel or other Windows startup components, the next opportunity for malware to start is by infecting a non-Microsoft boot-related driver. Traditional antimalware apps don’t start until after the boot-related drivers have been loaded, giving a rootkit disguised as a driver the opportunity to work. + - MDM: [DataProtection/AllowDirectMemoryAccess](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/client-management/mdm/policy-csp-dataprotection#dataprotection-allowdirectmemoryaccess) policy + - Group Policy: [Disable new DMA devices when this computer is locked](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-group-policy-settings#disable-new-dma-devices-when-this-computer-is-locked) (This setting is not configured by default.) -Early Launch Antimalware (ELAM) is designed to enable the antimalware solution to start before all non-Microsoft drivers and apps. ELAM checks the integrity of non-Microsoft drivers to determine whether the drivers are trustworthy. Because Windows needs to start as fast as possible, ELAM cannot be a complicated process of checking the driver files against known malware signatures. Instead, ELAM has the simple task of examining every boot driver and determining whether it is on the list of trusted drivers. If malware modifies a boot-related driver, ELAM will detect the change, and Windows will prevent the driver from starting, thus blocking driver-based rootkits. ELAM also allows the registered antimalware provider to scan drivers that are loaded after the boot process is complete. +For Thunderbolt v1 and v2 (DisplayPort Connector), refer to the “Thunderbolt Mitigation” section in [KB 2516445](https://support.microsoft.com/help/2516445/blocking-the-sbp-2-driver-and-thunderbolt-controllers-to-reduce-1394-d). +For SBP-2 and 1394 (a.k.a. Firewire), refer to the “SBP-2 Mitigation” section in [KB 2516445](https://support.microsoft.com/help/2516445/blocking-the-sbp-2-driver-and-thunderbolt-controllers-to-reduce-1394-d). + +## Attack countermeasures -Windows Defender in Windows 10 supports ELAM, as do Microsoft System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection and non-Microsoft antimalware apps. +This section covers countermeasures for specific types attacks. -To do this, ELAM loads an antimalware driver before drivers that are flagged as boot-start can be executed. This approach provides the ability for an antimalware driver to register as a trusted boot-critical driver. It is launched during the Trusted Boot process, and with that, Windows ensures that it is loaded before any other non-Microsoft software. +### Bootkits and rootkits -With this solution in place, boot drivers are initialized based on the classification that the ELAM driver returns according to an initialization policy. IT pros have the ability to change this policy through Group Policy. -ELAM classifies drivers as follows: +A physically-present attacker might attempt to install a bootkit or rootkit-like piece of software into the boot chain in an attempt to steal the BitLocker keys. +The TPM should observe this installation via PCR measurements, and the BitLocker key will not be released. +This is the default configuration. -- **Good.** The driver has been signed and has not been tampered with. -- **Bad.** The driver has been identified as malware. It is recommended that you not allow known bad drivers to be initialized. -- **Bad but required for boot.** The driver has been identified as malware, but the computer cannot successfully boot without loading this driver. -- **Unknown.** This driver has not been attested to by your malware-detection application or classified by the ELAM boot-start driver. +A BIOS password is recommended for defense-in-depth in case a BIOS exposes settings that may weaken the BitLocker security promise. +Intel Boot Guard and AMD Hardware Verified Boot support stronger implementations of Secure Boot that provide additional resilience against malware and physical attacks. +Intel Boot Guard and AMD Hardware Verified Boot are part of platform boot verification [standards for a highly secure Windows 10 device](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-highly-secure). -While the features listed above protect the Windows boot process from malware threats that could compromise BitLocker security, it is important to note that DMA ports may be enabled during the window of time between when BitLocker unlocks the drive and Windows boots to the point that Windows can set any port related policies that have been configured. This period of time where the encryption key could be exposed to a DMA attack could be less than a minute on recent devices or longer depending on system performance. The use of pre-boot authentication with a PIN can be used to successfully mitigate against an attack. +### Brute force attacks against a PIN +Require TPM + PIN for anti-hammering protection. -### Protection After Startup: eliminate DMA availability +### DMA attacks -Windows Modern Standby–certified devices do not have DMA ports, eliminating the risk of DMA attacks. On other devices, you can disable FireWire, Thunderbolt, or other ports that support DMA. +See [Protecting Thunderbolt and other DMA ports](#protecting-thunderbolt-and-other-dma-ports) earlier in this topic. -## See also -- [Types of Attacks for Volume Encryption Keys](types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md) -- [Choose the right BitLocker countermeasure](choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md) -- [Protect BitLocker from pre-boot attacks](protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md) -- [BitLocker overview](bitlocker-overview.md) +### Paging file, crash dump, and Hyberfil.sys attacks +These files are secured on an encrypted volume by default when BitLocker is enabled on OS drives. +It also blocks automatic or manual attempts to move the paging file. + +### Memory remanence + +Enable Secure Boot and require a password to change BIOS settings. +For customers requiring protection against these advanced attacks, configure a TPM+PIN protector, disable Standby power management, and shut down or hibernate the device before it leaves the control of an authorized user. + +## Attacker countermeasures + +The following sections cover mitigations for different types of attackers. + +### Attacker without much skill or with limited physical access + +Physical access may be limited by a form factor that does not expose buses and memory. +For example, there are no external DMA-capable ports, no exposed screws to open the chassis, and memory is soldered to the mainboard. +This attacker of opportunity does not use destructive methods or sophisticated forensics hardware/software. + +Mitigation: +- Pre-boot authentication set to TPM only (the default) + +### Attacker with skill and lengthy physical access + +Targeted attack with plenty of time; this attacker will open the case, will solder, and will use sophisticated hardware or software. + +Mitigation: +- Pre-boot authentication set to TPM with a PIN protector (with a sophisticated alphanumeric PIN to help the TPM anti-hammering mitigation). + + -And- + +- Disable Standby power management and shut down or hibernate the device before it leaves the control of an authorized user. This can be set using Group Policy: + + - Computer Configuration|Policies|Administrative Templates|Windows Components|File Explorer|Show hibernate in the power options menu + - Computer Configuration|Policies|Administrative Templates|System|Power Management|Sleep Settings|Allow standby states (S1-S3) when sleeping (plugged in) + - Computer Configuration|Policies|Administrative Templates|System|Power Management|Sleep Settings|Allow standby states (S1-S3) when sleeping (on battery) + +These settings are **Not configured** by default. + +For some systems, bypassing TPM-only may require opening the case, and may require soldering, but could possibly be done for a reasonable cost. Bypassing a TPM with a PIN protector would cost much more, and require brute forcing the PIN. With a sophisticated enhanced PIN, it could be nearly impossible. The Group Policy setting for [enhanced PIN](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-group-policy-settings#a-href-idbkmk-unlockpol2aallow-enhanced-pins-for-startup) is: + +Computer Configuration|Administrative Templates|Windows Components|BitLocker Drive Encryption|Operating System Drives|Allow enhanced PINs for startup + +This setting is **Not configured** by default. + +For secure administrative workstations, Microsoft recommends TPM with PIN protector and disable Standby power management and shut down or hibernate the device. + +## See also + +- [Blocking the SBP-2 driver and Thunderbolt controllers to reduce 1394 DMA and Thunderbolt DMA threats to BitLocker](https://support.microsoft.com/help/2516445/blocking-the-sbp-2-driver-and-thunderbolt-controllers-to-reduce-1394-d) +- [BitLocker Group Policy settings](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/bitlocker-group-policy-settings) +- [BitLocker CSP](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/client-management/mdm/bitlocker-csp) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md deleted file mode 100644 index c1b351b15e..0000000000 --- a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,138 +0,0 @@ ---- -title: Choose the right BitLocker countermeasure (Windows 10) -description: This section outlines the best countermeasures you can use to protect your organization from bootkits and rootkits, brute force sign-in, Direct Memory Access (DMA) attacks, Hyberfil.sys attacks, and memory remanence attacks. -ms.assetid: b0b09508-7885-4030-8c61-d91458afdb14 -ms.prod: w10 -ms.mktglfcycl: deploy -ms.sitesec: library -ms.pagetype: security -author: brianlic-msft -ms.date: 10/27/2017 ---- - -# Choose the right BitLocker countermeasure - -**Applies to** -- Windows 10 - -This section outlines the best countermeasures you can use to protect your organization from bootkits and rootkits, brute force sign-in, Direct Memory Access (DMA) attacks, Hyberfil.sys attacks, and memory remanence attacks. -You can use BitLocker to protect your Windows 10 PCs. Whichever operating system you’re using, Microsoft and Windows-certified devices provide countermeasures to address attacks and improve your data security. In most cases, this protection can be implemented without the need for pre-boot authentication. - -Tables 1 and 2 summarize the recommended mitigations for different types of attacks against PCs running recent versions of Windows. The orange blocks indicate that the system requires additional configuration from the default settings. - - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-

Windows 8.1
without TPM

 -

Windows 8.1 Certified
(with TPM)

-

Bootkits and
Rootkits

Without TPM, boot integrity checking is not available

Secure by default when UEFI-based Secure Boot is enabled and a firmware password is required to change settings

-

Brute Force
Sign-in

Secure by default, and can be improved with account lockout Group Policy

Secure by default, and can be improved with account lockout and device lockout Group Policy settings

-

DMA
Attacks

If policy is deployed, secure by default for all lost or stolen devices because new DMA devices are granted access only when an authorized user is signed in

If policy is deployed, secure by default for all lost or stolen devices because new DMA devices are granted access only when an authorized user is signed in

-

Hyberfil.sys
Attacks

Secure by default; hyberfil.sys secured on encrypted volume

Secure by default; hyberfil.sys secured on encrypted volume

-

Memory
Remanence
Attacks

Password protect the firmware and disable booting from external media. If an attack is viable, consider pre-boot authentication

Password protect the firmware and ensure Secure Boot is enabled. If an attack is viable, consider pre-boot authentication

- -**Table 1.**  How to choose the best countermeasures for Windows 8.1

- - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-

Windows 10
without TPM

 -

Windows 10 Certified
(with TPM)

-

Bootkits and
Rootkits

Without TPM, boot integrity checking is not available

Secure by default when UEFI-based Secure Boot is enabled and a firmware password is required to change settings

-

Brute Force
Sign-in

Secure by default, and can be improved with account lockout Group Policy

Secure by default, and can be improved with account lockout and device lockout Group Policy settings

-

DMA
Attacks

If policy is deployed, secure by default for all lost or stolen devices because new DMA devices are granted access only when an authorized user is signed in

Secure by default; certified devices do not expose vulnerable DMA busses.
Can be additionally secured by deploying policy to restrict DMA devices:

- -
-

Hyberfil.sys
Attacks

Secure by default; hyberfil.sys secured on encrypted volume

Secure by default; hyberfil.sys secured on encrypted volume

-

Memory
Remanence
Attacks

Password protect the firmware and disable booting from external media. If an attack is viable, consider pre-boot authentication

Password protect the firmware and ensure Secure Boot is enabled.
The most effective mitigation, which we advise for high-security devices, is to configure a TPM+PIN protector, disable Standby power management, and shut down or hibernate the device before it leaves the control of an authorized user.

- -**Table 2.**  How to choose the best countermeasures for Windows 10 - -The latest Modern Standby devices, primarily tablets, are designed to be secure by default against all attacks that might compromise the BitLocker encryption key. Other Windows devices can be secure by default too. DMA port–based attacks, which represent the attack vector of choice, are not possible on Modern Standby devices because these port types are prohibited. The inclusion of DMA ports on even non-Modern Standby devices is extremely rare on recent devices, particularly on mobile ones. This could change if Thunderbolt is broadly adopted, so IT should consider this when purchasing new devices. In any case, DMA ports can be disabled entirely, which is an increasingly popular option because the use of DMA ports is infrequent in the non-developer space. To prevent DMA port usage unless an authorized user is signed in, you can set the DataProtection/AllowDirectMemoryAccess policy by using Mobile Device Management (MDM) or the Group Policy setting **Disable new DMA devices when this computer is locked** (beginning with Windows 10, version 1703). This setting is **Not configured** by default. The path to the Group Policy setting is: - -**Computer Configuration|Administrative Templates|Windows Components|BitLocker Drive Encryption** - -Memory remanence attacks can be mitigated with proper configuration; in cases where the system memory is fixed and non-removable, they are not possible using published techniques. Even in cases where system memory can be removed and loaded into another device, attackers will find the attack vector extremely unreliable, as has been shown in the DRDC Valcartier group’s analysis (see [An In-depth Analysis of the Cold Boot Attack](http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA545078)). - -Windows 7 PCs share the same security risks as newer devices but are far more vulnerable to DMA and memory remanence attacks, because Windows 7 devices are more likely to include DMA ports, lack support for UEFI-based Secure Boot, and rarely have fixed memory. To eliminate the need for pre-boot authentication on Windows 7 devices, disable the ability to boot to external media, password-protect the BIOS configuration, and disable the DMA ports. If you believe that your devices may be a target of a memory remanence attack, where the system memory may be removed and put into another computer to gain access to its contents, consider testing your devices to determine whether they are susceptible to this type of attack. - -In the end, many customers will find that pre-boot authentication improves security only for a shrinking subset of devices within their organization. Microsoft recommends a careful examination of the attack vectors and mitigations -outlined in this document along with an evaluation of your devices before choosing to implement pre-boot authentication, which may not enhance the security of your devices and instead will only compromise the user experience and add to support costs. - -## See also -- [Types of attacks for volume encryption keys](types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md) -- [BitLocker Countermeasures](bitlocker-countermeasures.md) -- [Protect BitLocker from pre-boot attacks](protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md) -- [BitLocker overview](bitlocker-overview.md) -  -  diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/images/kernel-dma-protection.png b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/images/kernel-dma-protection.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..297809afdc Binary files /dev/null and b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/images/kernel-dma-protection.png differ diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/images/pre-boot-authentication-group-policy.png b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/images/pre-boot-authentication-group-policy.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..94d0720c76 Binary files /dev/null and b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/images/pre-boot-authentication-group-policy.png differ diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md deleted file mode 100644 index d67cd69a82..0000000000 --- a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,43 +0,0 @@ ---- -title: Protect BitLocker from pre-boot attacks (Windows 10) -description: This detailed guide will help you understand the circumstances under which the use of pre-boot authentication is recommended for devices running Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 8, or Windows 7; and when it can be safely omitted from a device’s configuration. -ms.assetid: 24d19988-fc79-4c45-b392-b39cba4ec86b -ms.prod: w10 -ms.mktglfcycl: deploy -ms.sitesec: library -ms.pagetype: security -author: brianlic-msft -ms.date: 04/19/2017 ---- -# Protect BitLocker from pre-boot attacks - - -**Applies to** -- Windows 10 - -This detailed guide will help you understand the circumstances under which the use of pre-boot authentication is recommended for devices running Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 8, or Windows 7; and when it can be safely omitted from a device’s configuration. - -BitLocker uses encryption to protect the data on your drive, but BitLocker security is only effective when the encryption key is protected. Many users have relied on pre-boot authentication to protect the operating system’s integrity, disk encryption solution (for example, encryption keys), and the PC’s data from offline attacks. With pre-boot authentication, users must provide some form of credential before unlocking encrypted volumes and starting -Windows. Typically, they authenticate themselves using a PIN or a USB flash drive as a key. - -Full-volume encryption using BitLocker Drive Encryption is vital for protecting data and system integrity on devices running the Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 8, or Windows 7 operating system. It is equally important to protect the BitLocker encryption key. On Windows 7 devices, sufficiently protecting that key often required pre-boot authentication, which many users find inconvenient and complicates device management. - -Pre-boot authentication provides excellent startup security, but it inconveniences users and increases IT management costs. Every time the PC is unattended, the device must be set to hibernate (in other words, shut down and powered off); when the computer restarts, users must authenticate before the encrypted volumes are unlocked. This requirement increases restart times and prevents users from accessing remote PCs until they can physically access the computer to authenticate, making pre-boot authentication unacceptable in the modern IT world, where users expect their devices to turn on instantly and IT requires PCs to be constantly connected to the network. - -If users lose their USB key or forget their PIN, they can’t access their PC without a recovery key. With a properly configured infrastructure, the organization’s support will be able to provide the recovery key, but doing so increases support costs, and users might lose hours of productive work time. - -Starting with Windows 8, Secure Boot and Windows Trusted Boot startup process ensures operating system integrity, allowing Windows to start automatically while minimizing the risk of malicious startup tools and rootkits. In addition, many modern devices are fundamentally physically resistant to sophisticated attacks against the computer’s memory, and now Windows authenticates the user before making devices that may represent a threat to the device and encryption keys available for use. - -## In this topic - -The sections that follow help you understand which PCs still need pre-boot authentication and which can meet your security requirements without the inconvenience of it. - -- [Types of attacks for volume encryption keys](types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md) -- [BitLocker countermeasures](bitlocker-countermeasures.md) -- [Choose the right BitLocker countermeasure](choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md) - -## See also - -- [BitLocker overview](bitlocker-overview.md) -  -  diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md b/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md deleted file mode 100644 index d96b30a8c5..0000000000 --- a/windows/security/information-protection/bitlocker/types-of-attacks-for-volume-encryption-keys.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,129 +0,0 @@ ---- -title: Types of attacks for volume encryption keys (Windows 10) -description: There are many ways Windows helps protect your organization from attacks, including Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) secure boot, Trusted Platform Module (TPM), Group Policy, complex passwords, and account lockouts. -ms.assetid: 405060a9-2009-44fc-9f84-66edad32c6bc -ms.prod: w10 -ms.mktglfcycl: deploy -ms.sitesec: library -ms.pagetype: security -author: brianlic-msft -ms.date: 10/27/2017 ---- - -# Types of attacks for volume encryption keys - -**Applies to** -- Windows 10 - -There are many ways Windows helps protect your organization from attacks, including Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) Secure Boot, Trusted Platform Module (TPM), Group Policy, complex passwords, and account lockouts. - -The next few sections describe each type of attack that could be used to compromise a volume encryption key, whether for BitLocker or a non-Microsoft encryption solution. After an attacker has compromised a volume encryption key, the attacker can read data from your system drive or even install malware while Windows is offline. Each section begins with a graphical overview of the attack’s strengths and weaknesses as well as suggested mitigations. - -### Bootkit and rootkit attacks - -Rootkits are a sophisticated and dangerous type of malware that runs in kernel mode, using the same privileges as the operating system. Because rootkits have the same or possibly even more rights than the operating system, they can completely hide themselves from Windows and even an antimalware solution. Often, rootkits are part of an entire suite of malware that can bypass local logins, record passwords, transfer private files, and capture cryptography keys. - -Different types of bootkits and rootkits load at different software levels: - -- **Kernel level.** Rootkits running at the kernel level have the highest privilege in the operating system. They may be able to inject malicious code or replace portions of the core operating system, including both the kernel and device drivers. -- **Application level.** These rootkits are aimed to replace application binaries with malicious code, such as a Trojan, and can even modify the behavior of existing applications. -- **Library level.** The purpose of library-level rootkits is to hook, patch, or replace system calls with malicious code that can hide the malware’s presence. -- **Hypervisor level.** Hypervisor rootkits target the boot sequence. Their primary purpose is to modify the boot sequence to load themselves as a hypervisor. -- **Firmware level.** These rootkits overwrite the PC’s BIOS firmware, giving the malware low-level access and potentially the ability to install or hide malware, even if it’s cleaned or removed from the hard disk. - -Regardless of the operating system or encryption method, rootkits have access to confidential data once installed. Application-level rootkits can read any files the user can access, bypassing volume-level encryption. Kernel-, library-, hypervisor-, and firmware-level rootkits have direct access to system files on encrypted volumes and can also retrieve an encryption key from memory. - -Windows offers substantial protection from bootkits and rootkits, but it is possible to bypass operating system security when an attacker has physical access to the device and can install the malware to the device while Windows is offline. For example, an attacker might boot a PC from a USB flash drive containing malware that starts before Windows. The malware can replace system files or the PC’s firmware or simply start Windows under its control. - -To sufficiently protect a PC from boot and rootkits, devices must use pre-boot authentication or Secure Boot, or the encryption solution must use the device’s Trusted Platform Module (TPM) as a means of monitoring the integrity of the end-to-end boot process. Pre-boot authentication is available for any device, regardless of the hardware, but because it is inconvenient to users, it should be used only to mitigate threats that are applicable to the device. On devices with Secure Boot enabled, you do not need to use pre-boot authentication to protect against boot and rootkit attacks. - -Although password protection of the UEFI configuration is important for protecting a device’s configuration and preventing an attacker from disabling Secure Boot, use of a TPM and its Platform Configuration Register (PCR) measurements (PCR7) to ensure that the system’s bootloader (whether a Windows or non-Microsoft encryption solution) is tamper free and the first code to start on the device is critical. An encryption solution that doesn’t use a device’s TPM to protect its components from tampering may be unable to protect itself from bootkit-level infections that could log a user’s password or acquire encryption keys. - -For this reason, when BitLocker is configured on devices that include a TPM, the TPM and its PCRs are always used to secure and confirm the integrity of the pre–operating system environment before making encrypted volumes accessible. - -Any change to the UEFI configuration invalidates the PCR7 and requires the user to enter the BitLocker recovery key. Because of this feature, it’s not critical to password-protect your UEFI configuration. But UEFI password protection is a best practice and is still required for systems not using a TPM (such as non-Microsoft alternatives). - -### Brute-force Sign-in Attacks - -Attackers can find any password if you allow them to guess enough times. The process of trying millions of different passwords until you find the right one is known as a *brute-force sign-in attack*. In theory, an attacker could obtain any password by using this method. - -Three opportunities for brute-force attacks exist: - -- **Against the pre-boot authenticator.** An attacker could attack the device directly by attempting to guess the user’s BitLocker PIN or an equivalent authenticator. The TPM mitigates this approach by invoking an anti-hammering lockout capability that requires the user to wait until the lockout period ends or enter the BitLocker recovery key. -- **Against the recovery key.** An attacker could attempt to guess the 48-digit BitLocker recovery key. Even without a lockout period, the key is long enough to make brute-force attacks impractical. Specifically, the BitLocker recovery key has 128 bits of entropy; thus, the average brute-force attack would succeed after 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 guesses. If an attacker could guess 1 million passwords per second, the average brute-force attack would require more than 580,000 years to be successful. -- **Against the operating system sign-in authenticator.** An attacker can attempt to guess a valid user name and password. Windows implements a delay between password guesses, slowing down brute-force attacks. In addition, all recent versions of Windows allow administrators to require complex passwords and password lockouts. Similarly, administrators can use Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync policy or Group Policy to configure Windows 8.1 and Windows 8 to automatically restart and require the user to enter the BitLocker 48-digit recovery key after a specified number of invalid password attempts. When these settings are enabled and users follow best practices for complex passwords, brute-force attacks against the operating system sign-in are impractical. - -In general, brute-force sign-in attacks are not practical against Windows when administrators enforce complex passwords and account lockouts. - -### Direct Memory Access Attacks - -Direct memory access (DMA) allows certain types of hardware devices to communicate directly with a device’s system memory. For example, if you use Thunderbolt to connect another device to your computer, the second device automatically has Read and Write access to the target computer’s memory. - -Unfortunately, DMA ports don’t use authentication and access control to protect the contents of the computer’s memory. Whereas Windows can often prevent system components and apps from reading and writing to protected parts of memory, a device can use DMA to read any location in memory, including the location of any encryption keys. - -DMA attacks are relatively easy to execute and require little technical skills. Anyone can download a tool from the Internet, such as those made by [Passware](http://www.lostpassword.com/), [ElcomSoft](http://elcomsoft.com/), and -others, and then use a DMA attack to read confidential data from a PC’s memory. Because encryption solutions store their encryption keys in memory, they can be accessed by a DMA attack. - -Not all port types are vulnerable to DMA attacks. USB in particular does not allow DMA, but devices that have any of the following port types are vulnerable: - -- FireWire -- Thunderbolt -- ExpressCard -- PCMCIA -- PCI -- PCI-X -- PCI Express - -To perform a DMA attack, attackers typically connect a second PC that is running a memory-scanning tool (for example, Passware, ElcomSoft) to the FireWire or Thunderbolt port of the target computer. When connected, the software -scans the system memory of the target and locates the encryption key. Once acquired, the key can be used to decrypt the drive and read or modify its contents. - -A much more efficient form of this attack exists in theory: An attacker crafts a custom FireWire or Thunderbolt device that has the DMA attack logic programmed on it. Now, the attacker simply needs to physically connect the device. If the attacker does not have physical access, they could disguise it as a free USB flash drive and distribute it to employees of a target organization. When connected, the attacking device could use a DMA attack to scan the PC’s memory for the encryption key. It could then transmit the key (or any data in the PC’s memory) using the PC’s Internet connection or its own wireless connection. This type of attack would require an extremely high level of sophistication, because it requires that the attacker create a custom device (devices of these types are not readily available in the marketplace at this time). - -Today, one of the most common uses for DMA ports on Windows devices is for developer debugging, a task that some developers need to perform and one that few consumers will ever perform. Because USB; DisplayPort; and other, more secure port types satisfy consumers, most new mobile PCs do not include DMA ports. Microsoft’s view is that because of the inherent security risks of DMA ports, they do not belong on mobile devices, and Microsoft has prohibited their inclusion on any Modern Standby-certified devices. Modern Standby devices offer mobile phone–like power management and instant-on capabilities; at the time of writing, they are primarily found in Windows tablets. - -DMA-based expansion slots are another avenue of attack, but these slots generally appear only on desktop PCs that are designed for expansion. Organizations can use physical security to prevent outside attacks against their desktop PCs. In addition, a DMA attack on the expansion slot would require a custom device; as a result, an attacker would most likely insert an interface with a traditional DMA port (for example, FireWire) into the slot to attack the PC. - -To mitigate a port-based DMA attack an administrator can configure policy settings to disable FireWire and other device types that have DMA. Also, many PCs allow those devices to be disabled by using firmware settings. Although the need for pre-boot authentication can be eliminated at the device level or through Windows configuration, the BitLocker pre-boot authentication feature is still available when needed. When used, it successfully mitigates all types of DMA port and expansion slot attacks on any type of device. - -### Hiberfil.sys Attacks - -The hiberfil.sys file is the Windows hibernation file. It contains a snapshot of system memory that is generated when a device goes into hibernation and includes the encryption key for BitLocker and other encryption technologies. Attackers have claimed that they have successfully extracted encryption keys from the hiberfil.sys file. - -Like the DMA port attack discussed in the previous section, tools are available that can scan the hiberfile.sys file and locate the encryption key, including a tool made by [Passware](http://www.lostpassword.com/). Microsoft does not consider Windows to be vulnerable to this type of attack, because Windows stores the hiberfil.sys file within the encrypted system volume. As a result, the file would be accessible only if the attacker had both physical and sign-in access to the PC. When an attacker has sign-in access to the PC, there are few reasons for the attacker to decrypt the drive, because they would already have full access to the data within it. - -In practice, the only reason an attack on hiberfil.sys would grant an attacker additional access is if an administrator had changed the default Windows configuration and stored the hiberfil.sys file on an unencrypted drive. By default, Windows 10 is designed to be secure against this type of attack. - -### Memory Remanence Attacks - -A memory remanence attack is a side-channel attack that reads the encryption key from memory after restarting a PC. Although a PC’s memory is often considered to be cleared when the PC is restarted, memory chips don’t immediately lose their memory when you disconnect power. Therefore, an attacker who has physical access to the PC’s memory might be able to read data directly from the memory—including the encryption key. - -When performing this type of cold boot attack, the attacker accesses the PC’s physical memory and recovers the encryption key within a few seconds or minutes of disconnecting power. This type of attack was demonstrated by researchers at [Princeton University](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDaicPIgn9U). With the encryption key, the attacker would be able to decrypt the drive and access its files. - -To acquire the keys, attackers follow this process: - -1. Freeze the PC’s memory. For example, an attacker can freeze the memory to −50°C by spraying it with aerosol air duster spray. -2. Restart the PC. -3. Instead of restarting Windows, boot to another operating system. Typically, this is done by connecting a bootable flash drive or loading a bootable DVD. -4. The bootable media loads the memory remanence attack tools, which the attacker uses to scan the system memory and locate the encryption keys. -5. The attacker uses the encryption keys to access the drive’s data. - -If the attacker is unable to boot the device to another operating system (for example, if bootable flash drives have been disabled or Secure Boot is enabled), the attacker can attempt to physically remove the frozen memory from the device and attach it to a different, possibly identical device. Fortunately, this process has proven extremely unreliable, as evidenced by the Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) Valcartier group’s analysis (see [An In-depth Analysis of the Cold Boot Attack](http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA545078)). On an increasing portion of modern devices, this type of attack is not even possible, because memory is soldered directly to the motherboard. - -Although Princeton’s research proved that this type of attack was possible on devices that have removable memory, device hardware has changed since the research was published in 2008: - -- Secure Boot prevents the malicious tools that the Princeton attack depends on from running on the target device. -- Windows systems with BIOS or UEFI can be locked down with a password, and booting to a USB drive can be prevented. -- If booting to USB is required on the device, it can be limited to starting trusted operating systems by using Secure Boot. -- The discharge rates of memory are highly variable among devices, and many devices have memory that is completely immune to memory remanence attacks. -- Increased density of memory diminishes their remanence properties and reduces the likelihood that the attack can be successfully executed, even when memory is physically removed and placed in an identical system where the system’s configuration may enable booting to the malicious tools. - -Because of these factors, this type of attack is rarely possible on modern devices. Even in cases where the risk factors exist on legacy devices, attackers will find the attack unreliable. For detailed info about the practical uses for forensic memory acquisition and the factors that make a computer vulnerable or resistant to memory remanence attacks, read [An In-depth Analysis of the Cold Boot Attack](http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA545078). - -The BitLocker pre-boot authentication feature can successfully mitigate memory remanence attacks on most devices, but you can also mitigate such attacks by protecting the system UEFI or BIOS and prevent the PC from booting from external media (such as a USB flash drive or DVD). The latter option is often a better choice, because it provides sufficient protection without inconveniencing users with pre-boot authentication. - -## See also - -- [BitLocker countermeasures](bitlocker-countermeasures.md) -- [Choose the right BitLocker countermeasure](choose-the-right-bitlocker-countermeasure.md) -- [Protect BitLocker from pre-boot attacks](protect-bitlocker-from-pre-boot-attacks.md) -- [BitLocker overview](bitlocker-overview.md) diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/images/device-details-tab.png b/windows/security/information-protection/images/device-details-tab.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..4dfe33e156 Binary files /dev/null and b/windows/security/information-protection/images/device-details-tab.png differ diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/images/kernel-dma-protection-user-experience.png b/windows/security/information-protection/images/kernel-dma-protection-user-experience.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8949c51627 Binary files /dev/null and b/windows/security/information-protection/images/kernel-dma-protection-user-experience.png differ diff --git a/windows/security/information-protection/kernel-dma-protection-for-thunderbolt.md b/windows/security/information-protection/kernel-dma-protection-for-thunderbolt.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fc494015d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/windows/security/information-protection/kernel-dma-protection-for-thunderbolt.md @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +--- +title: Kernel DMA Protection for Thunderbolt™ 3 (Windows 10) +description: Kernel DMA Protection protects PCs against drive-by Direct Memory Access (DMA) attacks using PCI hot plug devices connected to Thunderbolt™ 3 ports. +ms.prod: w10 +ms.mktglfcycl: deploy +ms.sitesec: library +ms.pagetype: security +author: aadake +ms.date: 09/06/2018 +--- + +# Kernel DMA Protection for Thunderbolt™ 3 + +**Applies to** +- Windows 10 + +In Windows 10 version 1803, Microsoft introduced a new feature called Kernel DMA Protection to protect PCs against drive-by Direct Memory Access (DMA) attacks using PCI hot plug devices connected to Thunderbolt™ 3 ports. +Drive-by DMA attacks can lead to disclosure of sensitive information residing on a PC, or even injection of malware that allows attackers to bypass the lock screen or control PCs remotely. + +This feature does not protect against DMA attacks via 1394/FireWire, PCMCIA, CardBus, ExpressCard, and so on. + +## Background + +PCI devices are DMA-capable, which allows them to read and write to system memory at will, without having to engage the system processor in these operations. +The DMA capability is what makes PCI devices the highest performing devices available today. +These devices have historically existed only inside the PC chassis, either connected as a card or soldered on the motherboard. +Access to these devices required the user to turn off power to the system and disassemble the chassis. +Today, this is no longer the case with Thunderbolt™. + +Thunderbolt™ technology has provided modern PCs with extensibility that was not available before for PCs. +It allows users to attach new classes of external peripherals, such as graphics cards or other PCI devices, to their PCs with a hot plug experience identical to USB. +Having PCI hot plug ports externally and easily accessible makes PCs susceptible to drive-by DMA attacks. + +Drive-by DMA attacks are attacks that occur while the owner of the system is not present and usually take less than 10 minutes, with simple to moderate attacking tools (affordable, off-the-shelf hardware and software) that do not require the disassembly of the PC. +A simple example would be a PC owner leaves the PC for a quick coffee break, and within the break, and attacker steps in, plugs in a USB-like device and walks away with all the secrets on the machine, or injects a malware that allows them to have full control over the PC remotely. + +## How Windows protects against DMA drive-by attacks + +Windows leverages the system Input/Output Memory Management Unit (IOMMU) to block external devices from starting and performing DMA unless the drivers for these devices support memory isolation (such as DMA-remapping). +Devices with compatible drivers will be automatically enumerated, started and allowed to perform DMA to their assigned memory regions. +Devices with incompatible drivers will be blocked from starting and performing DMA until an authorized user signs into the system or unlocks the screen. + +## User experience + +![Kernel DMA protection user experience](images/kernel-dma-protection-user-experience.png) + +A device that is incompatible with DMA-remapping will be blocked from starting if the device was plugged in before an authorized user logs in, or while the screen is locked. +Once the system is unlocked, the device driver will be started by the OS, and the device will continue to function normally until the system is rebooted, or the device is unplugged. +The devices will continue to function normally if the user locks the screen or logs out of the system. + +## System compatibility + +Kernel DMA Protection requires new UEFI firmware support. +This support is anticipated only on newly-introduced, Intel-based systems shipping with Windows 10 version 1803 (not all systems). Virtualization-based Security (VBS) is not required. + +To see if a system supports Kernel DMA Protection, check the System Information desktop app (MSINFO32). +Systems released prior to Windows 10 version 1803 do not support Kernel DMA Protection, but they can leverage other DMA attack mitigations as described in [BitLocker countermeasures](bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures.md). + +>[!NOTE] +>Kernel DMA Protection is not compatible with other BitLocker DMA attacks countermeasures. It is recommended to disable the BitLocker DMA attacks countermeasures if the system supports Kernel DMA Protection. Kernel DMA Protection provides higher security bar for the system over the BitLocker DMA attack countermeasures, while maintaining usability of external peripherals. + +## Enabling Kernel DMA protection + +Systems running Windows 10 version 1803 that do support Kernel DMA Protection do have this security feature enabled automatically by the OS with no user or IT admin configuration required. + +**To check if a device supports kernel DMA protection** + +1. Launch MSINFO32.exe in a command prompt, or in the Windows search bar. +2. Check the value of **Kernel DMA Protection**. + ![Kernel DMA protection](bitlocker/images/kernel-dma-protection.png) +3. If the current state of **Kernel DMA Protection** is OFF and **Virtualization Technology in Firmware** is NO: + - Reboot into BIOS settings + - Turn on Intel Virtualization Technology. + - Turn on Intel Virtualization Technology for I/O (VT-d). In Windows 10 version 1803, only Intel VT-d is supported. Other platforms can use DMA attack mitigations described in BitLocker Countermeasures. + - Reboot system into Windows 10. +4. If the state of **Kernel DMA Protection** remains Off, then the system does not support this feature. + +## Frequently asked questions + +### Do in-market systems support Kernel DMA protection for Thunderbolt™ 3? +In market systems, released with Windows 10 version 1709 or earlier, will not support Kernel DMA protection for Thunderbolt™ 3 after upgrading to Windows 10 version 1803, as this feature requires the BIOS/platform firmware changes and guarantees. + +### Does Kernel DMA Protection prevent drive-by DMA attacks during Boot? +No, Kernel DMA Protection only protects against drive-by DMA attacks after the OS is loaded. It is the responsibility of the system firmware/BIOS to protect against attacks via the Thunderbolt™ 3 ports during boot. + +### How can I check if a certain driver supports DMA-remapping? +DMA-remapping is supported for specific device drivers, and is not universally supported by all devices and drivers on a platform. To check if a specific driver is opted into DMA-remapping, check the values corresponding to the following Property GUID (highlighted in red in the image below) in the Details tab of a device in Device Manager. A value of 0 or 1 means that the device driver does not support DMA-remapping. A value of 2 means that the device driver supports DMA-remapping. +Please check the driver instance for the device you are testing. Some drivers may have varying values depending on the location of the device (internal vs. external). + +![Kernel DMA protection user experience](images/device-details-tab.png) + +### What should I do if the drivers for my Thunderbolt™ 3 peripherals do not support DMA-remapping? +If the peripherals do have class drivers provided by Windows 10, please use these drivers on your systems. If there are no class drivers provided by Windows for your peripherals, please contact your peripheral vendor/driver vendor to update the driver to support this functionality. Details for driver compatibility requirements can be found here (add link to OEM documentation). + +### Do Microsoft drivers support DMA-remapping? +In Windows 10 1803 and beyond, the Microsoft inbox drivers for USB XHCI (3.x) Controllers, Storage AHCI/SATA Controllers and Storage NVMe Controllers support DMA-remapping. + +### Do drivers for non-PCI devices need to be compatible with DMA-remapping? +No. Devices for non-PCI peripherals, such as USB devices, do not perform DMA, thus no need for the driver to be compatible with DMA-remapping. + +### How can an enterprise enable the “External device enumeration” policy? +The “External device enumeration” policy controls whether to enumerate external devices that are not compatible with DMA-remapping. Devices that are compatible with DMA-remapping are always enumerated. The policy can be enabled via Group Policy or Mobile Device Management (MDM): +- Group Policy: Administrative Templates\System\Kernel DMA Protection\Enumeration policy for external devices incompatible with Kernel DMA Protection +- MDM: [DmaGuard policies](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/client-management/mdm/policy-csp-dmaguard#dmaguard-policies) + +## Related topics + +- [BitLocker countermeasures](bitlocker/bitlocker-countermeasures.md) +- [DmaGuard MDM policies](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/client-management/mdm/policy-csp-dmaguard#dmaguard-policies) diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/TOC.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/TOC.md index 7e687dd04c..2d5f0c92fd 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/TOC.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/TOC.md @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ ##### [Hardware-based isolation](windows-defender-application-guard/install-wd-app-guard.md) ###### [Confguration settings](windows-defender-application-guard/configure-wd-app-guard.md) ##### [Application control](windows-defender-application-control/windows-defender-application-control.md) +##### [Device control](device-guard/introduction-to-device-guard-virtualization-based-security-and-windows-defender-application-control.md) +###### [Memory integrity](windows-defender-exploit-guard/memory-integrity.md) +####### [Hardware qualifications](windows-defender-exploit-guard/requirements-and-deployment-planning-guidelines-for-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md) +####### [Enable HVCI](windows-defender-exploit-guard/enable-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md) ##### [Exploit protection](windows-defender-exploit-guard/enable-exploit-protection.md) ###### [Customize exploit protection](windows-defender-exploit-guard/customize-exploit-protection.md) ###### [Import/export configurations](windows-defender-exploit-guard/import-export-exploit-protection-emet-xml.md) diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/device-guard/introduction-to-device-guard-virtualization-based-security-and-windows-defender-application-control.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/device-guard/introduction-to-device-guard-virtualization-based-security-and-windows-defender-application-control.md index 72a7d46264..b56a7a46b9 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/device-guard/introduction-to-device-guard-virtualization-based-security-and-windows-defender-application-control.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/device-guard/introduction-to-device-guard-virtualization-based-security-and-windows-defender-application-control.md @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ --- -title: Device Guard is the combination of Windows Defender Application Control and Virtualization-based security (Windows 10) +title: Device Guard is the combination of Windows Defender Application Control and virtualization-based protection of code integrity (Windows 10) description: Device Guard consists of both hardware and software system integrity hardening capabilites that can be deployed separately or in combination. keywords: virtualization, security, malware ms.prod: w10 ms.mktglfcycl: deploy ms.localizationpriority: medium author: mdsakibMSFT -ms.date: 08/2/2018 +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- -# Device Guard: Windows Defender Application Control and Virtualization-based security +# Device Guard: Windows Defender Application Control and virtualization-based protection of code integrity **Applies to** - Windows 10 diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/index.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/index.md index ba15937384..4ec7962649 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/index.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/index.md @@ -1,18 +1,21 @@ --- title: Threat Protection (Windows 10) description: Learn how Windows Defender ATP helps protect against threats. +keywords: threat protection, windows defender advanced threat protection, attack surface reduction, next generation protection, endpoint detection and response, automated investigation and response, secure score, advanced hunting +search.product: eADQiWindows 10XVcnh ms.prod: w10 ms.mktglfcycl: deploy ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security -ms.localizationpriority: high author: dansimp -ms.date: 09/03/2018 +ms.localizationpriority: medium +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- # Threat Protection -Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) is a unified platform for preventative protection, post-breach detection, automated investigation, and response. Windows Defender ATP protects endpoints from cyber threats; detects advanced attacks and data breaches, automates security incidents and improves security posture. +Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (Windows Defender ATP) is a unified platform for preventative protection, post-breach detection, automated investigation, and response. Windows Defender ATP protects endpoints from cyber threats; detects advanced attacks and data breaches, automates security incidents and improves security posture. +

Windows Defender ATP

diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/intelligence/top-scoring-industry-antivirus-tests.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/intelligence/top-scoring-industry-antivirus-tests.md index 0b05818396..e984e5abab 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/intelligence/top-scoring-industry-antivirus-tests.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/intelligence/top-scoring-industry-antivirus-tests.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- title: Top scoring in industry antivirus tests -description: Industry antivirus tests landing page +description: Windows Defender Antivirus consistently achieves high scores in independent tests. View the latest scores and analysis. keywords: security, malware, av-comparatives, av-test, av, antivirus ms.prod: w10 ms.mktglfcycl: secure @@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.author: ellevin author: levinec -ms.date: 08/17/2018 +ms.date: 09/05/2018 --- # Top scoring in industry antivirus tests -[Windows Defender Antivirus](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-antivirus/windows-defender-antivirus-in-windows-10?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) **consistently achieves high scores** from independent tests, displaying how it is a top choice in the antivirus market. +[Windows Defender Antivirus](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-antivirus/windows-defender-antivirus-in-windows-10?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) **consistently achieves high scores** in independent tests, displaying how it is a top choice in the antivirus market. We want to be transparent and have gathered top industry reports that demonstrate our enterprise antivirus capabilities. Note that these tests only provide results for antivirus and do not test for additional security protections. -In the real world, millions of devices are protected from cyberattacks every day, sometimes [milliseconds after a campaign starts](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2018/03/07/behavior-monitoring-combined-with-machine-learning-spoils-a-massive-dofoil-coin-mining-campaign?ocid=cx-docs-avreports). In many cases, customers might not even know they were protected. That's because Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection ([Windows Defender ATP](https://www.microsoft.com/WindowsForBusiness/windows-atp?ocid=cx-docs-avreports)) [next generation protection](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy3MOxkX_o4) detects and stops malware at first sight by using predictive technologies, [machine learning](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2018/06/07/machine-learning-vs-social-engineering?ocid=cx-docs-avreports), [artificial intelligence](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2018/02/14/how-artificial-intelligence-stopped-an-emotet-outbreak?ocid=cx-docs-avreports), behavioral analysis, and other advanced technologies. +In the real world, millions of devices are protected from cyberattacks every day, sometimes [milliseconds after a campaign starts](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2018/03/07/behavior-monitoring-combined-with-machine-learning-spoils-a-massive-dofoil-coin-mining-campaign?ocid=cx-docs-avreports). Windows Defender AV is part of the [next generation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy3MOxkX_o4) Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection ([Windows Defender ATP](https://www.microsoft.com/WindowsForBusiness/windows-atp?ocid=cx-docs-avreports)) security stack which addresses the latest and most sophisticated threats today. In many cases, customers might not even know they were protected. That's because Windows Defender AV detects and stops malware at first sight by using [machine learning](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2018/06/07/machine-learning-vs-social-engineering?ocid=cx-docs-avreports), [artificial intelligence](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2018/02/14/how-artificial-intelligence-stopped-an-emotet-outbreak?ocid=cx-docs-avreports), behavioral analysis, and other advanced technologies. > [!TIP] > Learn why [Windows Defender Antivirus is the most deployed in the enterprise](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2018/03/22/why-windows-defender-antivirus-is-the-most-deployed-in-the-enterprise?ocid=cx-docs-avreports). @@ -27,24 +27,20 @@ In the real world, millions of devices are protected from cyberattacks every day ## AV-TEST: Perfect protection score of 6.0/6.0 in the latest test -**[Analysis of the latest AV-TEST results](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2v60I?ocid=cx-docs-avreports)** -The AV-TEST Product Review and Certification Report tests on three categories: protection, performance, and usability. The scores listed below are for the protection category which has two scores: real world testing and the AV-TEST reference set (known as "prevalent malware"). +The AV-TEST Product Review and Certification Report tests on three categories: protection, performance, and usability. The scores listed below are for the Protection category which has two scores: Real-World Testing and the AV-TEST reference set (known as "Prevalent Malware"). -**Real-World testing** as defined by AV-TEST attempts to test protection against zero-day malware attacks, inclusive of web and email threats. +### May-June 2018 AV-TEST Business User test: [Protection score 6.0/6.0](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/june-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-182374/) | [Analysis](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2v60I?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) **Latest** -**Prevalent malware** as defined by AV-TEST attempts to test detection of widespread and prevalent malware discovered in the last four weeks. + Windows Defender AV achieved an overall Protection score of 6.0/6.0, detecting 100% of 5,790 malware samples. With the latest results, Windows Defender AV has achieved 100% on 10 of the 12 most recent antivirus tests (combined "Real-World" and "Prevalent malware"). -The below scores are the results of AV-TEST's evaluations on **Windows Defender Antivirus**. +### March-April 2018 AV-TEST Business User test: [Protection score 5.5/6.0](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/april-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-181574/) | [Analysis](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2ouJA?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) -|Month (2018)|Real-World test score| Prevalent malware test score | AV-TEST report| Microsoft analysis| -|---|---|---|---|---| -|January| 100.00%| 99.92%| [Report (Jan-Feb)](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/february-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-180674/)| [Analysis (Jan-Feb)](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE27O5A?ocid=cx-docs-avreports)| -|February| 100.00% | 100.00%|[Report (Jan-Feb)](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/february-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-180674/)| [Analysis (Jan-Feb)](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE27O5A?ocid=cx-docs-avreports)| -March |98.00%| 100.00%|[Report (Mar-Apr)](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/april-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-181574/)|[Analysis (Mar-Apr)](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2ouJA?ocid=cx-docs-avreports)| -April|100.00%| 100.00%|[Report (Mar-Apr)](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/april-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-181574/)|[Analysis (Mar-Apr)](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2ouJA?ocid=cx-docs-avreports)| -May|100.00%| 100.00%| [Report (May-Jun)](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/june-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-182374/) |[Analysis (May-Jun)](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2v60I?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) **Latest**| -June|100.00%| 100.00%| [Report (May-Jun)](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/june-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-182374/)|[Analysis (May-Jun)](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2v60I?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) **Latest**| + Windows Defender AV achieved an overall Protection score of 5.5/6.0, missing 2 out of 5,680 malware samples (0.035% miss rate). + +### January-February 2018 AV-TEST Business User test: [Protection score 6.0/6.0](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/business-windows-client/windows-10/february-2018/microsoft-windows-defender-antivirus-4.12-180674/) | [Analysis](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE27O5A?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) + +Windows Defender AV achieved an overall Protection score of 6.0/6.0, with 5,105 malware samples tested. ||| |---|---| @@ -57,33 +53,26 @@ June|100.00%| 100.00%| [Report (May-Jun)](https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/b AV-Comparatives is an independent organization offering systematic testing for security software such as PC/Mac-based antivirus products and mobile security solutions. -The **Real-World Protection Test (Enterprise)** as defined by AV-Comparatives attempts to evaluate the “real-world” protection capabilities with default settings. The goal is to find out whether the security software protects the computer by either hindering the malware from changing any systems or remediating all changes if any were made. +### Real-World Protection Test July (Consumer): [Protection Rate 100%](https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/real-world-protection-test-july-2018-factsheet/) **Latest** -The **Malware Protection Test Enterprise** as defined by AV-Comparatives attempts to assesses a security program’s ability to protect a system against infection by malicious files before, during or after execution. It is only tested every six months. +The results are based on testing against 186 malicious URLs that have working exploits or point directly to malware. -The below scores are the results of AV-Comparatives tests on **Windows Defender Antivirus**. The scores represent the percentage of blocked malware. +### Real-World Protection Test March - June (Enterprise): [Protection Rate 98.7%](https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/real-world-protection-test-enterprise-march-june-2018-testresult/) -|Month (2018)| Real-World test score| Malware test score (every 6 months)| -|---|---|---| -|February| 100.00%| N/A| -|March| 94.40%| 99.90%| -|April| 96.40%| N/A| -|May| 100.00%| N/A| -|June| 99.50%| N/A| -|July| 100.00%| N/A| +This test, as defined by AV-Comparatives, attempts to assess the effectiveness of each security program to protect a computer against active malware threats while online. -* [Real-World Protection Test (Enterprise) February - June 2018](https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/real-world-protection-test-february-june-2018/) +### Malware Protection Test March 2018 (Enterprise): [Protection Rate 99.9%](https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-enterprise-march-2018-testresult/) -* [Malware Protection Test Enterprise March 2018](https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-enterprise-march-2018-testresult/) +This test, as defined by AV-Comparatives, attempts to assesses a security program’s ability to protect a system against infection by malicious files before, during or after execution. -* [Real-World Protection Test (Enterprise) July 2018](https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/real-world-protection-test-july-2018-factsheet/) **Latest** +[Historical AV-Comparatives Microsoft tests](https://www.av-comparatives.org/vendors/microsoft/) ## To what extent are tests representative of protection in the real world? -It is important to remember that Microsoft sees a wider and broader set of threats beyond just what’s tested in the AV evaluations highlighted above. The capabilities within [Windows Defender ATP](https://www.microsoft.com/WindowsForBusiness/windows-atp?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) also provide [additional layers of protection](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2017/12/11/detonating-a-bad-rabbit-windows-defender-antivirus-and-layered-machine-learning-defenses?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) that are not factored into AV tests. Using these tests, customer can view one aspect of their security suite but can't assess the complete protection of all the security features. +It is important to remember that Microsoft sees a wider and broader set of threats beyond what’s tested in the antivirus evaluations highlighted above. Windows Defender AV encounters ~200 million samples every month, and the typical antivirus test consists of between 100-5,000 samples. The vastness of the malware landscape makes it extremely difficult to evaluate the quality of protection against real world threats. -There are other technologies in nearly every endpoint security suite not represented in AV tests that address some of the latest and most sophisticated threats. For example, the capabilities such as attack surface reduction and endpoint detection & response help prevent malware from getting onto devices in the first place. +The capabilities within [Windows Defender ATP](https://www.microsoft.com/WindowsForBusiness/windows-atp?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) also provide [additional layers of protection](https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2017/12/11/detonating-a-bad-rabbit-windows-defender-antivirus-and-layered-machine-learning-defenses?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) that are not factored into industry tests. These technologies address some of the latest and most sophisticated threats. Isolating AV from the rest of Windows Defender ATP creates a partial picture of how our security stack operates in the real world. For example, attack surface reduction and endpoint detection & response capabilities can help prevent malware from getting onto devices in the first place. We have proven that Windows Defender ATP components [catch samples that Windows Defender AV missed](https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/RE2ouJA?ocid=cx-docs-avreports) in these industry tests, which is more representative of how effectively our security suite protects customers in the real world. -Microsoft is highly engaged in working with several independent testers to evolve security testing to focus on the end-to-end security stack. In the meantime, customers can evaluate Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection in their own networks by signing up for a [90-day trial of Windows Defender ATP](https://www.microsoft.com/windowsforbusiness/windows-atp?ocid=cx-docs-avreports), or [enabling Preview features on existing tenants](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/preview-settings-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection?ocid=cx-docs-avreports). +Using independent tests, customers can view one aspect of their security suite but can't assess the complete protection of all the security features. Microsoft is highly engaged in working with several independent testers to evolve security testing to focus on the end-to-end security stack. In the meantime, customers can evaluate Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection in their own networks by signing up for a [90-day trial of Windows Defender ATP](https://www.microsoft.com/windowsforbusiness/windows-atp?ocid=cx-docs-avreports), or [enabling Preview features on existing tenants](https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/preview-settings-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection?ocid=cx-docs-avreports). ![ATP](./images/wdatp-pillars2.png) diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-antivirus/scheduled-catch-up-scans-windows-defender-antivirus.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-antivirus/scheduled-catch-up-scans-windows-defender-antivirus.md index e85493f83c..4bb34b0d77 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-antivirus/scheduled-catch-up-scans-windows-defender-antivirus.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-antivirus/scheduled-catch-up-scans-windows-defender-antivirus.md @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ Location | Setting | Description | Default setting (if not configured) Scan | Specify the scan type to use for a scheduled scan | Quick scan Scan | Specify the day of the week to run a scheduled scan | Specify the day (or never) to run a scan. | Never Scan | Specify the time of day to run a scheduled scan | Specify the number of minutes after midnight (for example, enter **60** for 1 am). | 2 am -Root | Randomize scheduled task times | Randomize the start time of the scan to any interval from 0 to 4 hours, or to any interval plus or minus 30 minutes for non-Windows Defebder Antivirus scans. This can be useful in VM or VDI deployments. | Enabled +Root | Randomize scheduled task times | Randomize the start time of the scan to any interval from 0 to 4 hours, or to any interval plus or minus 30 minutes for non-Windows Defender Antivirus scans. This can be useful in VM or VDI deployments. | Enabled **Use PowerShell cmdlets to schedule scans:** diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-application-guard/wd-app-guard-overview.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-application-guard/wd-app-guard-overview.md index 9ff9ac7dca..de2039986d 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-application-guard/wd-app-guard-overview.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-application-guard/wd-app-guard-overview.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ ms.pagetype: security ms.localizationpriority: medium author: justinha ms.author: justinha -ms.date: 07/09/2018 +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- # Windows Defender Application Guard overview diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/TOC.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/TOC.md index 4eb6f33c8d..073a9201b3 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/TOC.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/TOC.md @@ -171,8 +171,12 @@ ## [Configure and manage capabilities](onboard.md) ### [Configure attack surface reduction](configure-attack-surface-reduction.md) #### [Hardware-based isolation](../windows-defender-application-guard/install-wd-app-guard.md) -##### Configuration settings](../windows-defender-application-guard/configure-wd-app-guard.md) +##### [Configuration settings](../windows-defender-application-guard/configure-wd-app-guard.md) #### [Application control](../windows-defender-application-control/windows-defender-application-control.md) +#### [Device control](../device-guard/introduction-to-device-guard-virtualization-based-security-and-windows-defender-application-control.md) +##### [Memory integrity](../windows-defender-exploit-guard/memory-integrity.md) +###### [Hardware qualifications](../windows-defender-exploit-guard/requirements-and-deployment-planning-guidelines-for-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md) +###### [Enable HVCI](../windows-defender-exploit-guard/enable-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md) #### [Exploit protection](../windows-defender-exploit-guard/enable-exploit-protection.md) ##### [Customize exploit protection](../windows-defender-exploit-guard/customize-exploit-protection.md) ##### [Import/export configurations](../windows-defender-exploit-guard/import-export-exploit-protection-emet-xml.md) diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-features-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-features-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index acaeab8a05..28bcbdb441 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-features-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-features-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas ms.localizationpriority: medium -ms.date: 09/03/2018 +ms.date: 09/06/2018 --- # Configure advanced features in Windows Defender ATP @@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ Turn on the following advanced features to get better protected from potentially When you enable this feature, you'll be able to take advantage of the automated investigation and remediation features of the service. For more information, see [Automated investigations](automated-investigations-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md). ## Auto-resolve remediated alerts -The Automated investigations capability is configured by default to resolve alerts where the automated analysis result status is "No threats found" or "Remediated". +You can configure the automated investigations capability to resolve alerts where the automated analysis result status is "No threats found" or "Remediated". >[!NOTE] > - The result of the auto-resolve action may influence the Machine risk level calculation which is based on the active alerts found on a machine. >- If a security operations analyst manually sets the status of an alert to "In progress" or "Resolved" the auto-resolve capability will not overrite it. -If you dont want to have alerts auto-resolved, youll need to manually turn off the feature. +If you don't want to have alerts auto-resolved, you'll need to manually turn off the feature. ## Block file This feature is only available if your organization uses Windows Defender Antivirus as the active antimalware solution and that the cloud-based protection feature is enabled. diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index 2b53bf10ef..7b40ec9d0d 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/advanced-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Check out the [Advanced Hunting repository](https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows ## Related topic - [Advanced hunting reference](advanced-hunting-reference-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md) -- [Advanced hunting query language best practices](/advanced-hunting-best-practices-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md) +- [Advanced hunting query language best practices](advanced-hunting-best-practices-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md) diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/alerts-queue-endpoint-detection-response.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/alerts-queue-endpoint-detection-response.md index a2d22d5330..cce2d0c0a3 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/alerts-queue-endpoint-detection-response.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/alerts-queue-endpoint-detection-response.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-attack-surface-reduction.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-attack-surface-reduction.md index 6630431d3f..f48dd12b3e 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-attack-surface-reduction.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-attack-surface-reduction.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 07/01/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index 22998f989d..82a78124e7 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-server-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-server-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index ea9af9e5bd..d31a895006 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-server-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/configure-server-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ ms.mktglfcycl: deploy ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high -ms.date: 09/04/2018 +ms.localizationpriority: medium +ms.date: 09/06/2018 --- # Onboard servers to the Windows Defender ATP service @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ The service supports the onboarding of the following servers: - Windows Server, version 1803 - Windows Server 2019 -## Onboard Windows Server 2012 R2 and Windows Server 2016 +## Windows Server 2012 R2 and Windows Server 2016 -To onboard your servers to Windows Defender ATP, you’ll need to: +To onboard Windows Server 2012 R2 and Windows Server 2016 to Windows Defender ATP, you’ll need to: - For Windows Server 2012 R2: Configure and update System Center Endpoint Protection clients. - Turn on server monitoring from Windows Defender Security Center. @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ Agent Resource | Ports | winatp-gw-aus.microsoft.com | 443| | winatp-gw-aue.microsoft.com |443 | -## Onboard Windows Server, version 1803 and Windows Server 2019 -You’ll be able to onboard in the same method available for Windows 10 client machines. For more information, see [Onboard Windows 10 machines](configure-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md). Support for Windows Server, version 1803 and Windows 2019 provides deeper insight into activities happening on the server, coverage for kernel and memory attack detection, and enables response actions on Windows Server endpoint as well. +## Windows Server, version 1803 and Windows Server 2019 +To onboard Windows Server, version 1803 or Windows Server 2019, use the same method used when onboarding Windows 10 machines. For more information, see [Onboard Windows 10 machines](configure-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md). Support for Windows Server, version 1803 and Windows 2019 provides deeper insight into activities happening on the server, coverage for kernel and memory attack detection, and enables response actions on Windows Server endpoint as well. 1. Configure Windows Defender ATP onboarding settings on the server. For more information, see [Onboard Windows 10 machines](configure-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md). diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/custom-detection-rules.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/custom-detection-rules.md index c7df3eceaa..e9d21b6f95 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/custom-detection-rules.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/custom-detection-rules.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/data-storage-privacy-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/data-storage-privacy-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index b4de052320..1efa791236 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/data-storage-privacy-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/data-storage-privacy-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -10,13 +10,12 @@ ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas ms.localizationpriority: medium -ms.date: 07/05/2018 +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- # Windows Defender ATP data storage and privacy **Applies to:** - - Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (Windows Defender ATP) diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/evaluate-atp.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/evaluate-atp.md index d4962ce985..760908772b 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/evaluate-atp.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/evaluate-atp.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 08/10/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/get-started.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/get-started.md index 917cbf300d..ea37ae0629 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/get-started.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/get-started.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ The attack surface reduction set of capabilities provide the first line of defen **Next generation protection**
To further reinforce the security perimeter of your network, Windows Defender ATP uses next generation protection designed to catch all types of emerging threats. -**Endpoint protection and response**
-Endpoint protection and response capabilities are put in place to detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats that may have made it past the first two security pillars. +**Endpoint detection and response**
+Endpoint detection and response capabilities are put in place to detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats that may have made it past the first two security pillars. **Auto investigation and remediation**
In conjunction with being able to quickly respond to advanced attacks, Windows Defender ATP offers automatic investigation and remediation capabilities that help reduce the volume of alerts in minutes at scale. diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/manage-edr.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/manage-edr.md index c1bec85f06..97ff8bd046 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/manage-edr.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/manage-edr.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 07/01/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/management-apis.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/management-apis.md index 591e15faba..2e0966140c 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/management-apis.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/management-apis.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-config.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-config.md index 75fbcf69a7..77af2ccba3 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-config.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-config.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-integration.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-integration.md index cecf0f1a7b..4b4962140d 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-integration.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/microsoft-cloud-app-security-integration.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index f788a1dd65..0ec05caa9c 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/mssp-support-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/onboard.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/onboard.md index cd9030b575..39ee66db3c 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/onboard.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/onboard.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-attack-surface-reduction.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-attack-surface-reduction.md index 90b081cc1e..98d08c46d6 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-attack-surface-reduction.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-attack-surface-reduction.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 07/01/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-custom-detections.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-custom-detections.md index 4ca46423a1..9b2912076d 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-custom-detections.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-custom-detections.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-endpoint-detection-response.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-endpoint-detection-response.md index a40fccae5f..31b65ba716 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-endpoint-detection-response.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-endpoint-detection-response.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hardware-based-isolation.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hardware-based-isolation.md index 02cf4a6b5a..9d8cdabaae 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hardware-based-isolation.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hardware-based-isolation.md @@ -8,19 +8,19 @@ ms.pagetype: security author: justinha ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.author: justinha -ms.date: 08/16/2018 +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- # Hardware-based isolation in Windows 10 **Applies to:** Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (Windows Defender ATP) -Hardware-based isolation helps protect system integrity in Windows 10 and is integreated with Windows Defender ATP. +Hardware-based isolation helps protect system integrity in Windows 10 and is integrated with Windows Defender ATP. | Feature | Description | |------------|-------------| -| [Windows Defender Application Guard](../windows-defender-application-guard/wd-app-guard-overview.md) | Isolates untrusted sites and protects your company while your employees browse the Internet. | -| [Windows Defender System Guard](how-hardware-based-containers-help-protect-windows.md) | Protects and maintains the integrity of the system | +| [Windows Defender Application Guard](../windows-defender-application-guard/wd-app-guard-overview.md) | Application Guard protects your device from advanced attacks while keeping you productive. Using a unique hardware-based isolation approach, the goal is to isolate untrusted websites and PDF documents inside a lightweight container that is separated from the operating system via the native Windows Hypervisor. If an untrusted site or PDF document turns out to be malicious, it still remains contained within Application Guard’s secure container, keeping the desktop PC protected and the attacker away from your enterprise data. | +| [Windows Defender System Guard](how-hardware-based-containers-help-protect-windows.md) | System Guard protects and maintains the integrity of the system as it starts and after it's running, and validates system integrity by using attestation. | diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index b3d6c3cfb7..598138a8ef 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview-hunting-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/12/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview.md index 813d97f8c4..1277a549bf 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/overview.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/preview-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/preview-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index be77829814..3eab3eda81 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/preview-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/preview-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Windows Defender ATP integrates with Azure Security Center to provide a comprehe Microsoft Cloud App Security leverages Windows Defender ATP endpoint signals to allow direct visibility into cloud application usage including the use of unsupported cloud services (shadow IT) from all Windows Defender ATP monitored machines. -- [Onboard Windows Server 2019](configure-server-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md#onboard-windows-server-version-1803-and-windows-server-2019)
+- [Onboard Windows Server 2019](configure-server-endpoints-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md#windows-server-version-1803-and-windows-server-2019)
Windows Defender ATP now adds support for Windows Server 2019. You'll be able to onboard Windows Server 2019 in the same method available for Windows 10 client machines. - [Onboard previous versions of Windows](onboard-downlevel-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md)
diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/run-detection-test-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/run-detection-test-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index 9f5eeb8670..ad774f962c 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/run-detection-test-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/run-detection-test-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -10,18 +10,24 @@ ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas ms.localizationpriority: medium -ms.date: 11/06/2017 +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- # Run a detection test on a newly onboarded Windows Defender ATP machine **Applies to:** +- Supported Windows 10 versions +- Windows Server 2012 R2 +- Windows Server 2016 +- Windows Server, version 1803 +- Windows Server, 2019 - Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (Windows Defender ATP) Run the following PowerShell script on a newly onboarded machine to verify that it is properly reporting to the Windows Defender ATP service. -1. Open an elevated command-line prompt on the machine and run the script: +1. Create a folder: 'C:\test-WDATP-test'. +2. Open an elevated command-line prompt on the machine and run the script: a. Go to **Start** and type **cmd**. @@ -29,7 +35,7 @@ Run the following PowerShell script on a newly onboarded machine to verify that ![Window Start menu pointing to Run as administrator](images/run-as-admin.png) -2. At the prompt, copy and run the following command: +3. At the prompt, copy and run the following command: ``` powershell.exe -NoExit -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -WindowStyle Hidden (New-Object System.Net.WebClient).DownloadFile('http://127.0.0.1/1.exe', 'C:\test-WDATP-test\invoice.exe');Start-Process 'C:\test-WDATP-test\invoice.exe' diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/threat-protection-integration.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/threat-protection-integration.md index a336f30021..b491a5a109 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/threat-protection-integration.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/threat-protection-integration.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/12/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-onboarding-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-onboarding-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index e15d044a19..e7c34f1bb9 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-onboarding-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-onboarding-windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas ms.localizationpriority: medium -ms.date: 04/24/2018 +ms.date: 09/07/2018 --- # Troubleshoot Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection onboarding issues @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Event ID | Error Type | Resolution steps ## Troubleshoot onboarding issues using Microsoft Intune You can use Microsoft Intune to check error codes and attempt to troubleshoot the cause of the issue. -If you have configured policies in Intune and they are not propagated on machines, you might need to configure automatic MDM enrollment. For more information, see the [Configure automatic MDM enrollment](https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=829597) section. +If you have configured policies in Intune and they are not propagated on machines, you might need to configure automatic MDM enrollment. Use the following tables to understand the possible causes of issues while onboarding: diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-wdatp.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-wdatp.md index 271c270c35..12f36df3a9 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-wdatp.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/troubleshoot-wdatp.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md index dc5416368f..a67e865ccb 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-advanced-threat-protection.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 09/03/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-security-center-atp.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-security-center-atp.md index 126c30c6b5..ea7e9fd67b 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-security-center-atp.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-atp/windows-defender-security-center-atp.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ ms.sitesec: library ms.pagetype: security ms.author: macapara author: mjcaparas -ms.localizationpriority: high +ms.localizationpriority: medium ms.date: 07/01/2018 --- diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/requirements-and-deployment-planning-guidelines-for-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/requirements-and-deployment-planning-guidelines-for-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md index 42665e23e2..dc50235f04 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/requirements-and-deployment-planning-guidelines-for-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/requirements-and-deployment-planning-guidelines-for-virtualization-based-protection-of-code-integrity.md @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ author: brianlic-msft ms.date: 10/20/2017 --- -# Requirements and deployment planning guidelines for virtualization-based protection of code integrity +# Baseline protections and additional qualifications for virtualization-based protection of code integrity **Applies to** - Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (Windows Defender ATP) -Computers must meet certain hardware, firmware, and software requirements in order to take adavantage of all of the virtualization-based security (VBS) features in Windows Defender Device Guard. Computers lacking these requirements can still be protected by Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) policies—the difference is that those computers will not be as hardened against certain threats. +Computers must meet certain hardware, firmware, and software requirements in order to take adavantage of all of the virtualization-based security (VBS) features in [Windows Defender Device Guard](../device-guard/introduction-to-device-guard-virtualization-based-security-and-windows-defender-application-control.md). Computers lacking these requirements can still be protected by Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) policies—the difference is that those computers will not be as hardened against certain threats. For example, hardware that includes CPU virtualization extensions and SLAT will be hardened against malware that attempts to gain access to the kernel, but without protected BIOS options such as “Boot only from internal hard drive,” the computer could be booted (by a malicious person who has physical access) into an operating system on bootable media. diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-security-center/wdsc-firewall-network-protection.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-security-center/wdsc-firewall-network-protection.md index 4986db4e3e..06fbec6d1e 100644 --- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-security-center/wdsc-firewall-network-protection.md +++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-security-center/wdsc-firewall-network-protection.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ ms.date: 04/30/2018 - Windows 10, version 1703 and later -The **Firewall & network protection** section contains information about the firewalls and network connections used by the machine, including the status of Windows Defender Firewall and any other third-party firewalls. IT administrators and IT pros can get configuration guidance from the [Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security documentation library](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/access-protection/windows-firewall/windows-firewall-with-advanced-security). +The **Firewall & network protection** section contains information about the firewalls and network connections used by the machine, including the status of Windows Defender Firewall and any other third-party firewalls. IT administrators and IT pros can get configuration guidance from the [Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security documentation library](../windows-firewall/windows-firewall-with-advanced-security.md). In Windows 10, version 1709 and later, the section can be hidden from users of the machine. This can be useful if you don't want employees in your organization to see or have access to user-configured options for the features shown in the section. @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ This can only be done in Group Policy. > >You must have Windows 10, version 1709 or later. The ADMX/ADML template files for earlier versions of Windows do not include these Group Policy settings. -1. On your Group Policy management machine, open the [Group Policy Management Console](https://technet.microsoft.com/library/cc731212.aspx), right-click the Group Policy Object you want to configure and click **Edit**. +1. On your Group Policy management machine, open the Group Policy Management Console, right-click the Group Policy Object you want to configure and click **Edit**. 3. In the **Group Policy Management Editor** go to **Computer configuration** and click **Administrative templates**. @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ This can only be done in Group Policy. 6. Open the **Hide the Firewall and network protection area** setting and set it to **Enabled**. Click **OK**. -7. [Deploy the updated GPO as you normally do](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee663280(v=vs.85).aspx). +7. Deploy the updated GPO as you normally do. >[!NOTE] >If you hide all sections then the app will show a restricted interface, as in the following screenshot:

Attack surface reduction