From aad18597d55be0d14b8144523ee8ed9b1591b7be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joyce Y <47188252+mypil@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:43:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fixes markdown issue in line 85

---
 .../windows-firewall/server-isolation-policy-design-example.md  | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-firewall/server-isolation-policy-design-example.md b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-firewall/server-isolation-policy-design-example.md
index f693d8a70b..b93e884682 100644
--- a/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-firewall/server-isolation-policy-design-example.md
+++ b/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-firewall/server-isolation-policy-design-example.md
@@ -82,4 +82,4 @@ If Woodgrove Bank wants to implement server isolation without domain isolation,
 
 You do not have to include the encryption-capable rules on all devices. Instead, you can create GPOs that are applied only to members of the NAG, in addition to the standard domain isolation GPO, that contain connection security rules to support encryption.
 
-**Next: **[Certificate-based Isolation Policy Design Example](certificate-based-isolation-policy-design-example.md)
+**Next:** [Certificate-based Isolation Policy Design Example](certificate-based-isolation-policy-design-example.md)