* Updated deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md * Updated deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md * Updated deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md * updates for new vdi stuff * Adding important note to solve #3493 * Update windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-hybrid-key-whfb-settings-dir-sync.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * Typo "<"→"<", ">"→">" https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/application-management/manage-windows-mixed-reality * Issue #2297 * Update windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-identity-verification.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * Clarification * Update windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-identity-verification.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * Update windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-identity-verification.md Co-Authored-By: Trond B. Krokli <38162891+illfated@users.noreply.github.com> * update troubleshoot-np.md * update configure-endpoints-gp.md * Removing a part which is not supported * Name change * update troubleshoot-np.md * removed on-premises added -hello * Added link into Domain controller guide * Line corections * corrected formatting of xml code samples When viewing the page in Win 10/Edge, the xml code samples stretched across the page, running into the side menu. The lack of line breaks also made it hard to read. This update adds line breaks and syntax highlighting, replaces curly double quotes with standard double quotes, and adds a closing tag for <appv:appconnectiongroup>for each code sample * Update windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-identity-verification.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * Update windows/deployment/update/waas-delivery-optimization-reference.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * Update windows/deployment/update/waas-delivery-optimization-reference.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * corrected formating of XML examples The XML samples here present the same formatting problems as in about-the-connection-group-file51.md (see https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/windows-itpro-docs/pull/3847/) Perhaps we should open an issue to see if we have more versions of this code sample in the docs * corrected formatting of XML example section In the XML example on this page, the whitespace had been stripped out, so there were no spaces between adjacent attribute values or keys. This made it hard to read, though the original formatting allowed for a scroll bar, so the text was not running into the side of the page (compare to https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/windows-itpro-docs/pull/3847 and https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/windows-itpro-docs/pull/3850, where the uncorrected formatting forced the text to run into the side menu). * update configure-endpoints-gp.md * Fixed error in registry path and improved description * Update windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-hybrid-key-whfb-settings-dir-sync.md Co-Authored-By: Trond B. Krokli <38162891+illfated@users.noreply.github.com> * Removing extra line in 25 Suggested by * update windows-analytics-azure-portal.md * re: broken links, credential-guard-considerations Context: * #3513, MVA is being retired and producing broken links * #3860 Microsoft Virtual Academy video links This page contains two links to deprecated video content on Microsoft Virtual Academy (MVA). MVA is being retired. In addition, the Deep Dive course the two links point to is already retired, and no replacement course exists. I removed the first link, as I could not find a similar video available describing which credentials are covered by credential guard. I replaced the second link with a video containing similar material, though it is not a "deep dive". Suggestions on handling this problem, as many pages contain similar links, would be appreciated,. * removed link to retired video re: #3867 Context: * #3513, MVA is being retired and producing broken links * #3867, Microsoft Virtual Academy video links This page contains a broken link to deprecated video content on Microsoft Virtual Academy (MVA). MVA is being retired. In addition, the Deep Dive course is already retired, and no replacement course exists. I removed the whole _See Also_ section, as I could not find a video narrowly or deeply addressing how to protect privelaged users with Credential Guard. The most likely candidate is too short and general: https://www.linkedin.com/learning/cism-cert-prep-1-information-security-governance/privileged-account-management * addressing broken mva links, #3817 Context: * #3513, MVA is being retired and producing broken links * #3817, Another broken link This page contains two links to deprecated video content on Microsoft Virtual Academy (MVA). MVA is being retired. In addition, the Deep Dive course the two links point to is already retired, and no replacement course exists. I removed the first link, as we no longer have a video with similar content for a similar audience. The most likely candidate is https://www.linkedin.com/learning/programming-foundations-web-security-2/types-of-credential-attacks, which is more general and for a less technical audience. I removed the second link and the _See Also_ section, as I could not find a similar video narrowly focused on which credentials are covered by Credential Guard. Most of the related material available now describes how to perform a task. * Update deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md * typo fix re: #3876; DMSA -> DSMA * Addressing dead MVA links, #3818 This page, like its fellows in the mva-links label, contains links to a retired video course on a website that is retiring soon. The links listed by the user in issue #3818 were also on several other pages, related to Credentials Guard. These links were addressed in the pull requests #3875, #3872, and #3871 Credentials threat & lateral threat link: removed (see PR #3875 for reasoning) Virtualization link: replaced (see #3871 for reasoning) Credentials protected link: removed (see #3872 for reasoning) * Adding notes for known issue in script Solves #3869 * Updated the download link admx files Windows 10 Added link for April 2018 and Oct 2018 ADMX files. * added event logs path Referenced : https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/event-views-exploit-guard * Update browsers/internet-explorer/ie11-deploy-guide/administrative-templates-and-ie11.md Suggestions applied. Co-Authored-By: JohanFreelancer9 <48568725+JohanFreelancer9@users.noreply.github.com> * Update browsers/internet-explorer/ie11-deploy-guide/administrative-templates-and-ie11.md Co-Authored-By: JohanFreelancer9 <48568725+JohanFreelancer9@users.noreply.github.com> * Update deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md * screenshot update * Add files via upload * update 4 scrrenshots * Update deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md * Update browsers/internet-explorer/ie11-deploy-guide/administrative-templates-and-ie11.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * Update browsers/internet-explorer/ie11-deploy-guide/administrative-templates-and-ie11.md Co-Authored-By: Nicole Turner <39884432+nenonix@users.noreply.github.com> * Re: #3909 Top link is broken, #3909 > The link here does not work: > Applies to: Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection (Microsoft Defender ATP) The link to the pdf describing MDATP was broken. Thankfully, PR #2897 updated the same link in another page some time ago, so I didn't have to go hunting for an equivalent * CI Update * Updated as per task 3405344 * Updated author * Update windows-analytics-azure-portal.md * added the example query * Updated author fields * Update office-csp.md * update video for testing * update video * Update surface-hub-site-readiness-guide.md line 134 Fixed video link MD formatting * fixing video url * updates from Albert * Bulk replaced author to manikadhiman * Bulk replaced ms.author to v-madhi * Latest content is published (#371) * Added 1903 policy DDF link and fixed a typo * Reverted the DDF version * Latest update (#375) * Update deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md * Update deployment-vdi-windows-defender-antivirus.md
7.8 KiB
title, description, ms.assetid, ms.reviewer, ms.author, ms.prod, ms.mktglfcycl, ms.sitesec, ms.pagetype, ms.localizationpriority, author, manager, audience, ms.collection, ms.topic, ms.date
title | description | ms.assetid | ms.reviewer | ms.author | ms.prod | ms.mktglfcycl | ms.sitesec | ms.pagetype | ms.localizationpriority | author | manager | audience | ms.collection | ms.topic | ms.date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCOM Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax (Windows 10) | Describes the best practices, location, values, and security considerations for the DCOM Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax policy setting. | 0fe3521a-5252-44df-8a47-8d92cf936e7c | dansimp | w10 | deploy | library | security | medium | dansimp | dansimp | ITPro | M365-security-compliance | conceptual | 04/19/2017 |
DCOM: Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax
Applies to
- Windows 10
Describes the best practices, location, values, and security considerations for the DCOM: Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax policy setting.
Reference
This policy setting allows you to define additional computer-wide controls that govern access to all Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM)–based applications on a device. These controls restrict call, activation, or launch requests on the device. A simple way to think about these access controls is as an additional access check that is performed against a device-wide access control list (ACL) on each call, activation, or launch of any COM-based server. If the access check fails, the call, activation, or launch request is denied. (This check is in addition to any access check that is run against the server-specific ACLs.) In effect, it provides a minimum authorization standard that must be passed to access any COM-based server. This policy setting controls access permissions to cover call rights.
These device-wide ACLs provide a way to override weak security settings that are specified by an application through the CoInitializeSecurity function or application-specific security settings. They provide a minimum security standard that must be passed, regardless of the settings of the specific server.
These ACLs also provide a centralized location for an administrator to set a general authorization policy that applies to all COM-based servers on the device.
This policy setting allows you to specify an ACL in two different ways. You can type the security descriptor in SDDL, or you can grant or deny Local Access and Remote Access permissions to users and groups. We recommend that you use the built-in user interface to specify the ACL contents that you want to apply with this setting. The default ACL settings vary, depending on the version of Windows you are running.
Possible values
-
User-defined input of the SDDL representation of the groups and privileges
When you specify the users or groups that are to be given permissions, the security descriptor field is populated with the Security Descriptor Definition Language representation of those groups and privileges. Users and groups can be given explicit Allow or Deny privileges for local access and remote access.
-
Blank
This represents how the local security policy deletes the policy enforcement key. This value deletes the policy and then sets it as Not defined. The Blank value is set by using the ACL editor to empty the list, and then pressing OK.
Location
Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Policies\Security Options
Default values
The following table lists the actual and effective default values for this policy. Default values are also listed on the policy’s property page.
Server type or GPO | Default value |
---|---|
Default Domain Policy | Blank |
Default Domain Controller Policy | Blank |
Stand-Alone Server Default Settings | Blank |
DC Effective Default Settings | Not defined |
Member Server Effective Default Settings | Not defined |
Client Computer Effective Default Settings | Not defined |
Policy management
This section describes features and tools that are available to help you manage this policy.
Restart requirement
None. Changes to this policy become effective without a computer restart when they are saved locally or distributed through Group Policy.
Group Policy
The registry settings that are created as a result of enabling the DCOM: Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax policy setting take precedence over the previous registry settings when this policy setting was configured. The Remote Procedure Call (RPC) service checks the new registry keys in the Policies section for the computer restrictions, and these registry entries take precedence over the existing registry keys under OLE. This means that previously existing registry settings are no longer effective, and if you make changes to the existing settings, device access permissions for users are not changed. Use care in configuring the list of users and groups.
If the administrator is denied permission to access DCOM applications due to the changes made to DCOM in the Windows operating system, the administrator can use the DCOM: Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax policy setting to manage DCOM access to the computer. The administrator can use this setting to specify which users and groups can access the DCOM application on the computer locally and remotely. This will restore control of the DCOM application to the administrator and users. To do this, open the DCOM: Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax setting, and click Edit Security. Specify the users or groups you want to include and the computer access permissions for those users or groups. This defines the setting and sets the appropriate SDDL value.
Security considerations
This section describes how an attacker might exploit a feature or its configuration, how to implement the countermeasure, and the possible negative consequences of countermeasure implementation.
Vulnerability
Many COM applications include some security-specific code (for example, to call CoInitializeSecurity), but they use weak settings that allow unauthenticated access to the process. Administrators cannot override these settings to force stronger security in earlier versions of Windows without modifying the application. An attacker could attempt to exploit weak security in an individual application by attacking it through COM calls.
Also, the COM infrastructure includes the Remote Procedure Call Services (RPCSS), a system service that runs during and after computer startup. This service manages activation of COM objects and the running object table and provides helper services to DCOM remoting. It exposes RPC interfaces that can be called remotely. Because some COM-based servers allow unauthenticated remote access, these interfaces can be called by anyone, including unauthenticated users. As a result, RPCSS can be attacked by malicious users who use remote, unauthenticated computers.
Countermeasure
To protect individual COM-based applications or services, set the DCOM: Machine Access Restrictions in Security Descriptor Definition Language (SDDL) syntax setting to an appropriate device-wide ACL.
Potential impact
Windows implements default COM ACLs when they are installed. Modifying these ACLs from the default may cause some applications or components that communicate by using DCOM to fail. If you implement a COM-based server and you override the default security settings, confirm that the application-specific call permissions that ACL assigns are the correct permissions for appropriate users. If it does not, you must change your application-specific permission ACL to provide appropriate users with activation rights so that applications and Windows components that use DCOM do not fail.